The McCombies and
Alford
McCombies have been present in and around the Vale of Alford,
which lies about 30 miles west of Aberdeen, since at least the early 18th
Century. This tribe was remarkable for
the number of high-achieving individuals that it produced. Its geographical origins and its arrival in
this agricultural area of Aberdeenshire has been dealt with elsewhere (see William McCombie (1805 – 1880), “Creator of
a peculiarly excellent sort of bullocks” on this blogsite). Alford McCombie individuals who were
successful in life included members of the Established Church, the legal
profession, colonial administration, manufacturing and commerce, and
agriculture. The agricultural interest
was especially strong in the breeding and feeding of high-value, black cattle,
which are now called Aberdeen-Angus.
At the 1851 Census of Scotland five farms in and around the
Vale of Alford were being managed by members of the McCombie lineage,
Tillychetly - Charles McCombie (1803); Waulkmill – Alexander McCombie; Nether
Edindurno – William McCombie (1810); Tillyfour – William McCombie (1806);
Cairnballoch – William McCombie (1809).
Another relative, William McCombie (1803), was the Laird of the Easter
Skene estate, which lay half way to Aberdeen, but who also owned a farm in the
Alford area. All these establishments
were involved in cattle production. The
most prominent and internationally -important farmer was William McCombie of
Tillyfour, generally considered, along with Hugh Watson of Keillor Farm, Angus,
to have been the most significant developer of the Aberdeen Angus.
Cairnballoch Farm and
the early life of William McCombie (1809)
The farm of Cairnballoch was located about 3 miles south of
Alford in the direction of Craigievar Castle, then the seat of the Forbes
family. Cairnballoch, which was owned by Lord Forbes, consisted mostly of
undulating, “brae-set” land. At the 1851
Census of Scotland it encompassed 115 acres and typically four labourers were
employed there, thus making it a medium-sized farm in this decidedly rural part
of Aberdeenshire. William McCombie (1809) said that one of his earliest
memories was the risp of the sickle in the harvest field but the farm was also engaged
in cattle production.
William McCombie (1771) was the father of William McCombie
(1809), the subject of this story. William
senior was born at Logie Coldstone, a village lying about 10 miles south-west
of Alford and, at some date before 1809, William senior became the tenant of
Cairnballoch farm. According to James
Macdonell (see below), William was responsible for the reclamation of much land
on the farm from “rugged moorland and stony hillside”. He married his cousin, Marjory (May) McCombie,
at Tough a few miles east of Cairnballoch about 1808. Marjory also hailed from an agricultural
background. The marriage does not appear to have been very fecund, apparently
the only child being William McCombie junior, who was born at the family farm
in 1809. It was clearly expected that he
would follow in his father’s footsteps and become a farmer and, from an early
age, “… he
was charged with the duties of the farm and while he was still a youth the
chief share of the work fell to his hand.
At an age when most lads are still at the grammar school, he was holding
the plough and among the young men of the district he saw no more noble
exemplar of life than that presented by the farm labourers or the farmers’ sons
who, when the work of the day was done, thought of nothing but frolic or
sleep”.
There is a frustrating lack of factual precision concerning
events in the formative years of William McCombie (1809)’s life. What is available mostly comes from
recollections of associates, presumably drawing on conversations with William
and the most important of such sources is the obituary written by James
Macdonell, a one-time reporter with the Aberdeen Free Press, which was
published in the Spectator in 1870 following William’s death. William McCombie may only have enjoyed four
or five years of village schooling, perhaps between the ages of about eight and
thirteen (1817 – 1822). After all, how
much formal education would a farmer have needed in the early 19th
century?
William’s mother may have been involved in his home learning
and the Bible is said to have been a significant reading primer in this deeply
religious household. What must have
become clear at an early age to those around him was that the lad had developed
exceptional literacy, which quickly progressed into a prodigious capacity for
self-learning. It was later remarked
that one of his defining characteristics was a lack of self-publicity. How true.
In subsequent years, when William was writing profusely, the one topic
he never covered was himself, his home life and his early experiences. That William’s intellectual potential should blossom
in social circumstances which lacked articulate companions is little short of
remarkable and must surely have had a significant genetic component in its
determination. The many achievements of
his McCombie relatives tend to support such a notion.
William McCombie (1771) died at Cairnballoch in 1849 at the
age of 78, though his son, William McCombie (1809) had almost certainly taken
charge of the farm at an earlier date.
At the 1841 Census, while William senior was identified as the head of
the household, both he and his son were described as “Farmer”. One data set, that relating to participation
in local ploughing matches, indirectly suggests that the year of succession may
not have been later than 1845, when William junior was 36.
William McCombie
(1809) and ploughing matches
The ploughing match was one of two key events, the other
being the annual cattle show, in the local agricultural calendar of rural
Aberdeenshire in the mid-19th century. In his novel “Johnny Gibb of Gushetneuk” by
William Alexander (see below), which was inspired by Aberdeenshire and
Banffshire village life in the 1840s, there is an excellent description of the
mythical “Glengillodram Ploughing Match”, which highlights the significance and
conduct of such events. The ploughing
match was a winter event and, because of the short daylength in northern
latitudes, started at first light.
Typically, 30 to 40 competitors would assemble on the ploughing ground
with their pairs of horses, well-groomed, perhaps with tails and manes plaited
and with harness spotless. Competition
was intense and the crowds of spectators were highly knowledgeable. A single ploughman controlled both the horses
and the plough, and he cut his first, or “feirin”, furrow with great care,
regarding both straightness and constant depth on the patch of field allotted
to him. He then added another 30 or 40
furrows carefully aligned with the first and evenly packed. (Anyone
who ventures his/her skill at ploughing with horses, as the author has done,
quickly finds that it is utterly exhausting.) There were usually three competitions, one
for the best ploughing performance, one for the best turned-out pair of horses
and one for best-kept harness, but the first-mentioned was the one which
carried most prestige. The farmer
providing the ground would throw supper for his friends and the judges, though
the ploughmen would not usually be present.
They, instead, received a ploughman’s lunch, with whisky, during the
competition. In the late evening there would
be a ploughman’s ball, open to all levels of village life, from the laird down
to the day labourers, with vigorous dancing to fiddlers and/or a piper until a
late hour. Usually there would be a
break in the proceedings for oatcakes, cheese and whisky toddy. The next morning the manual labourers would
have to rise after a brief sleep to go back to work.
Ploughing matches have been a feature of Scottish rural life
since the late 18th century and they were established in the Vale of
Alford by the late 1830s. In the decade
1835 – 1844 the Aberdeen Journal recorded 82 separate mentions of ploughing
matches. This jumped to 288 mentions in
the following decade, with a similar frequency, 257, between in 1855 – 1864. The McCombies of Cairnballoch did not support
ploughing matches at all before 1845 but in the period to 1851 are known to
have provided help on 14 separate occasions.
Their interest in ploughing matches then ended almost as suddenly, there
being only one instance of cooperation recorded after the latter year. Support for ploughing matches could involve
allowing farm servants to compete, providing prize money, making available the
ploughing ground and gifting the following dinner, acting as a judge, or taking
the chair at dinner, giving a speech or supporting the chairman as croupier. As will be seen later, William McCombie
(1809) showed empathy with the farm labourers and it seems possible that the
Cairnballoch support of ploughing matches followed a change of regime at the
farm, with the retiral of William senior before 1845. The cessation of support for ploughing
matches after 1851 is less easy to explain.
William McCombie (1809) did spend more time away from the farm after
this date but he still retained his lease of Cairnballoch and continued in his
role as farmer there.
The intellectual
development of William McCombie (1809)
According to James Macdonell, “at times he (William McCombie (1809)) could get no more nourishing intellectual
fare than the “Penny Cyclopedia” or Harvey’s “Meditations among the
Tombs”. Nevertheless, he became an
insatiable reader. In the long evenings
of winter, he read by the light of the kitchen fire and when sent to Aberdeen
with the carts he seated himself on the top of the stuff which he was bringing
to Cairnballoch and read as the horses jogged slowly home.” William did not simply absorb knowledge, he
also analysed the information he acquired.
One subject over all others had a profound impact on the young man and
that was religion. Having been brought
up in a strictly religious household where “… the Bible still keeps a position
of almost Hebrew supremacy. It is
emphatically the Book of Books, morning and night it is read with such
eagerness and such thoroughness as can be matched only in the studies of the
commentator …”, his scope for original thought was thus constrained by
fundamental religious dogmas indelibly imprinted in his youthful mind and
afterwards ever-present to guide and direct his thinking processes. Within these boundaries he became “an
independent, original and vigorous thinker”.
William McCombie (1809), while still a young man oppressed by the
hard, physical work of the farm (ploughing “from six to six” or holding the
scythe “through a long summer day”), started to set down his thoughts on paper
in the form of essays which were eventually collected together in his first
book. “The stone windowsill of a little
opening in his father’s cottage he used as a writing desk and for the want of a
convenient seat he had to kneel on a large chest.” The book that emerged he called “Hours of
Thought”. It was published in London in
1835 when he was 26 and consisted of a series of essays which bore the titles, “On intellectual greatness”, “On moral
greatness”, “On poetry”, “On luxury”, “Obligations of Christians to devote
their energies to the dissemination of Christianity”, “On some defects in
evangelical preaching”, “On Christian Union”, “Future prospects of this world”. The precise dates of creation of the
individual components of the book are unknown but must have extended over
several years. The book enjoyed some
success and was published in a second edition in 1839 and a third edition in
1856.
If William McCombie (1809) had
ceased his intellectual endeavours at that point, it would still have been
truly remarkable that a 26-year-old farmer from a peripheral area of
Aberdeenshire, with only a few years of basic education, limited access to books
for self-education and no opportunity to debate and refine his thoughts with
educated colleagues, should have produced and got published a book of such
breadth. The title of this first book
indicates both William’s great strengths and his limitations. His confined upbringing and education left him
with a greater reverence for ideas than for facts, a limited appreciation of
the fruits of science but little sympathy for quantitation and the scientific
method for testing ideas. His technique
of inquiry was to absorb the writings of others and then to think deeply about
what he had learned, subjecting all constructions to his own mental tests,
before producing his synthesis of ideas on a given topic. The areas where he experienced greatest comfort
were Theology (the study of the nature of
God and religious belief), Philosophy (the
study of general and fundamental problems concerning matters such as existence,
knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language) and Metaphysics (abstract theory with no basis in reality). The result was that his readers were often
left in awe at his erudition and use of language but baffled by the complexity
and length of his writing, especially when dealing with religious and
philosophical topics. The obituary on William
McCombie in the Buchan Observer described his large library at Cairnballoch as
being “filled with treatises of revolting dryness on the controversies of
the Christian sects”. Some of his own works were impenetrable to
the general reader. Often reviews of his
books indicated that the reviewer fell into the “baffled” category, since
comments were reduced to the employment of superficial but complimentary
generalisations, for example, “By all those who are interested in the
harmony and consistency of religious truth, it will be highly
appreciated.”
It would probably be fair to say
that William developed a high local reputation as a theologian, philosopher and
social commentator but failed to make an impact on the national or the
international stage in these fields.
Still, those who met and conversed with him invariably came away with a powerful
impression of an honest and highly intelligent man, always capable of original
thinking. As the Buchan Observer put it,
“But
it was in conversation that his powers were most vividly seen”.
After his first book, “Hours of Thought” (1835), William
McCombie (1809) was involved with several other major publications as author,
or author/editor, or editor. They are
listed here, with date of publication.
In addition, he was also the creator of many newspaper articles.
1838. “The
Christian Church considered in relation to Unity and Schism” (author). In this theological book he dealt with the
importance of maintaining Christian unity and the sinfulness of actions that
promote division.
1842.
“Moral Agency, and Man as a Moral Agent” (author). The Baptist Magazine reviewed this book with
the following statement. ““There are two
great inquiries,” Mr McCombie states, “embraced in the following treatise viz 1st
What is moral agency, considered in itself? And 2ndly. What are the powers and conditions of man in
relation to it? Under the first the
author has endeavoured to ascertain what the nature of moral agency is and what are the indispensable conditions of
its being exercised; in doing so he has been led to inquire what the kind of
knowledge is which forms properly the basis of moral agency and how is it
obtained; and has endeavoured to meet the difficulties which arise from the
divine foreknowledge and to subvert the position that mind in its actings is
subject to the law of causation, or that in choosing and willing, it is not
free. In the second part of the treatise
the writer has entered on the inquiry what the powers and capabilities and
resources of man are , considered as a moral agent; in what respects and to
what extent he has considered in this light been affected by the sin of Adam or
the fall and in what respects and to what extent by the work of Christ.” Erudite theologians may have found such
theorising intriguing but for most adherents the content of the book must have
been perplexing.
1845.
“Memoirs of Alexander Bethune embracing selections from his correspondence and
literary remains” (author/editor). Alexander Bethune was one of three brothers
born into a peasant family in Fife in 1804.
Family poverty precluded him from being apprenticed in any trade,
resulting in Alexander becoming an agricultural labourer. Despite his strained circumstances, he proved
to have great skill in expressing himself in writing. The following example of his poetry shows the
extent of his talent in illustrating the circumstances of his life.
“And for my fare I ate a crust as
dry,
And drank from the ice-girded
stream, and rested
Upon a stone from which I swept the
snow
My dining-room had clouds for
tapestry,
Mountains for walls, the boundless
sky for ceiling,
And frosty winds for music
whistling through it.”
He composed a variety of works including “Tales and Sketches of
the Scottish Peasantry” and a series of lectures on economics (with his brother
John), designed to help the working man better his financial
circumstances. The Bethune brothers also
wrote stories and poetry, and, after John’s early death, Alexander published a
collection of his sibling’s poetic works.
Alexander Bethune wanted to reform the relationship between working men
on the one hand, and the tenant farmers and land owners on the other, which he
saw as exploitative. He believed a
change in such conditions would remove the feelings of bitterness, negativity
and addiction to charity engendered in the working class, thus acting as a
stimulus to them taking a positive attitude to the improvement of their
conditions of life. The Bethune brothers
practised what they preached. Alexander
and his brother built their own house with £30 and then invested a £5 fee from
Alexander’s first book in adding an extra storey, which they hoped eventually
to let. Alexander saw economics as a
more important subject than geography and thought it should be taught in
schools to all pupils. William McCombie
(1809) struck up a correspondence with Alexander Bethune. It is clear the two of them had a mutual
attraction arising from their similar circumstances, both being self-taught,
talented thinkers and writers, and being proponents of rural social
reform. The two met in 1842, a year
before Bethune’s death, when Alexander walked from Arbroath to
Aberdeenshire. Before his demise at the
age of 39, when illness precluded further intellectual work, Bethune entrusted
his archive to the care of William McCombie (1809) and this biographical work
about his friend was the product.
1850. “The foundations of individual
character. A lecture”
1852. “Modern Sacred
Poetry” (editor). Curiously, this volume was published by the Presbyterian
Church of Canada. It is a substantial
collection of works extending to 370 pages and it is presumed that the
selection of works to be included was made by William McCombie. The preface to the first edition, written by
William, was dated “Cairnballoch 22 June 1852”.
William McCombie saw sacred poetry as having “a high value both as
ministering to spiritual enjoyment and as influentially entering into that
great educational process – that training of the spiritual and moral nature –
essential alike to right doing, right being and to ultimate happiness.” It is interesting to note that in early 1853
the printer and friend of William McCombie (1809), George King, exported two
boxes of books from Aberdeen to Quebec, which may have been connected with this
poetic compilation by William (see below).
1852. “Use and abuse or right and wrong in the relations to
labour of capital, machinery and land”
(author). This essay on the economics of
capital and labour, especially as it applied to the relationship between
landowners, land occupiers and labourers in (then) current, rural Scotland
appears to have been influenced by the views of his friend Alexander Bethune,
but also by John Stuart Mill, the philosopher, social reformer and economist.
The book consists of two lectures produced independently (for delivery to local
Mutual Instruction classes – see below) which were then linked by an
introduction, written later.
Interestingly, one comment to a lecture audience remains, where William
admits that he tended to write and talk at too great a length. “(A) great part of a lecture I delivered last
July to a neighbouring class was occupied with these enquiries; to resume them
here, though it might be important to my general object, would be unendurable
by your patience.” William McCombie (1809) saw the fundamental
defect with the then current arrangements as being an unfair distribution of
capital between the different social strata.
“The distribution of the elements of wealth presented by nature to man
and of the constituents of wealth secured from Nature by man forms the great
social problem of the times. Not only
does this problem underlie all the various schemes of communism and
organisation of labour; but, discerned or not, is at the bottom of all
jealousies between employers and employed – of all strikes and combinations and
though more indirectly not the less truly of all questions of rent, protection
and the incidence of taxation.” He was
heavily critical of individuals who accumulated capital but did not invest it
to generate greater value. In this
context he was particularly critical of owners of large tracts of land which
were turned over to sporting estates and the rental income squandered, rather
than being invested in soil improvement for more productive agriculture. “Take the case of a proprietor of land in the
predicament already referred to. He
keeps a stud, or a pack of hounds; he passes the gay “season” in the
metropolis, gives expensive entertainments, patronizes opera artistes …”. However, he did not absolve the working class
from a measure of blame for its condition.
The monotony of manual labour combined with moral deficiency of
individuals were seen by him as major influences. “These causes, combined with defective
training in childhood and early association with the contaminated and deprived,
induce a hand-to-mouth and too often dissipated life.” He also saw alcohol consumption as a major
problem. “How many in all classes are poor – become bankrupts indeed – because
of the habits of expense they allow to grow on them. How many a one has the indulgence in strong
drink made to go hatless and shoeless and coatless and even shirtless, yea brought
to a premature grave - leaving probably a widow and half a dozen orphans on the
poor roll or in the workhouse.” Tobacco
consumption received a lashing too. This
was ironic for someone whose family wealth had been significantly based on
tobacco importation and snuff manufacture!
“…millions’ worth of the products of the earth and of human labour
combined annually vanish in mere smoke …”.
William McCombie (1809) also perceived another problem and that was the
use of borrowed money for speculative investment, for example on railway
shares. The modern financial system
would hardly have agreed with that notion!
William saw four general schemes
for the distribution and redistribution of wealth in society. 1. To
promote and fence large distributions in the hands of individuals by means of
social usage and public law. 2. By law to restrain accumulation and to compel
distribution. 3. To leave the distribution of wealth free,
like its production, to the spontaneous operation of social forces. 4. To
make the distribution of wealth entirely a matter of social arrangement
according to one or other of the schemes of communism. He rejected scheme 4 on the grounds that communism
“abolishes self-action and places individuals entirely under the direction of
others”. Scheme 1 represented the then
current position, where law (for example the Law of Hypothec and the Law of
Entail) protected the accumulation of wealth derived from land ownership, in a
few hands. He theoretically supported
Scheme 3 but admitted that no society was known which operated in this way “in
a state of enlightenment and moral elevation”.
He therefore concluded that there would have to be compulsion in the
redistribution of wealth, through the reform of the laws of the country. One has to admit – that is what has happened!
The history of land ownership and management
in Scotland was a particular target of William McCombie’s ire. He regretted the transformation of the
Highland chief from guardian of his people to landlord. “He no longer shares fish, fowl and fauna
with his retainers but keeps them for himself and persecutes tenants who take
them. The chief may no longer live
amongst his people but hundreds of miles away, often in London. He has no obligation to make a contribution
to his local community except when they fall into pauperism. He now may also claim the right to clear the
land of its people, land where their ancestors had an expectation to live. The tenant not only has to pay rent to the
landlord, but he also has to compete for a new tenancy at the end of a lease.” William McCombie’s radical solution to such
ills was essentially land nationalisation, where the Government would own the
land and let it to individuals on more favourable terms than the current owners.
1857. “On education in its constituents, objects and
issues” (author). This volume
contained a series of essays and lectures by William McCombie. In 1850 he had been one of a large number of
Scotsmen who had subscribed their names to a document calling for the reform of
the national educational curriculum, based on perceived deficiencies in then
current arrangements, ie education at the hands of the Established Church. Interestingly, James Adam, the editor of the
Free Press’ rival, the Aberdeen Herald (see below), was a co-signatory.
1860. “The
Literary Remains of George Murray with a sketch of his life”
(author/editor). George Murray was a
Peterhead loon born into straightened circumstances in 1819. At the early age of seven he showed great
persistence in improving his family’s income by wandering off into the country
and asking a farmer he met by chance for work, to which the farmer eventually
agreed. George was set to herding “the
kye” and was retained in this role by the farmer for six months. George Murray was then sent home with a
shilling in his hand and a fustian suite on his back. (“Fustian”
was a thick, hard-wearing cloth composed of cotton with linen or wool). Like William McCombie’s other hero, Alexander
Bethune, George Murray showed an early aptitude for reading. There were few books at home and George would
pick up scraps of newspaper in the street with which to practise his literary skills. He became apprenticed to a cobbler about the
age of 14 and eventually set up business on his own account, which he continued
until his death at the age of 40. While
working as a cobbler George spent long hours in self-education, becoming
thoroughly acquainted with poetry, theology and science, especially geography
and astronomy. Eventually he turned his
hand to writing and produced stories, essays and poetry, usually with a local
context. “A tale of Ugie in olden time”,
which was described as having “considerable dramatic merit”, shining out in a
rather barren Buchan creative landscape.
An example of his poetry follows, which attempts to buck up the working
class by turning them to religion.
“Wearied and worn one, stricken in spirit,
Fret not at feeling the gall in thy lot;
Seemingly favoured ones do not inherit
All thy imaginings – envy them not
Who shall give way to forebodings of sadness?
Clouds and thick darkness may compass our way;
But there’s an Eye ever beaming forth gladness,
Over and near us; look up! He will stay.”
George Murray was instrumental in setting up the Union Industrial
School for poor children in Peterhead and taught there for many years, while
still pursuing his occupation as a cobbler.
In 1855 he was recruited to work for the Aberdeen Free Press as
Peterhead reporter, a role he fulfilled with great tact and skill. For the last
two years of his life he was District Editor in charge of both the journalistic
and commercial aspects of the newspaper office.
In an obituary, the Peterhead Sentinel described him as “A man of
sterling integrity, unflinching independence and genuine Christian character,
he was respected while amongst us and will be deeply regretted and long
remembered.” When George Murray died at
the age of 40 from chronic enteritis of many years’ standing (inflammatory
bowel disease?) he left a widow and eight children. William McCombie (1809) then devised a plan
to publish and sell this volume of George Murray’s work, the proceeds to be
donated to his family. It was divided
into three sections, headed “Tales”, “Essays” and “Poetry” and the price was
2/6.
1864.
“Modern Civilisation and its relation to Christianity” (author). This was yet another volume of collected
essays by William McCombie (1809)
1869. “The Irish Land Question” (author). William
McCombie was a supporter of the Liberation Society which campaigned for the
abolition of state support to religion. At
a meeting held in Aberdeen in 1867 he moved a resolution, “That the
Irish Protestant Establishment is a gross political injustice and a fruitful source
of national disaffection, that the subsidising of other religious bodies is
equally to be condemned and instead of lessening the evil only renders it more
intolerable and that the only practical remedy is the withdrawal of all
legislative endowments for the maintenance of religion, due regard being had to
the existing interests of individuals.”
He was highly critical of
the Protestant Ascendancy, the insecure tenancy of the (mostly Catholic) Irish
peasantry and the lack of investment in land improvement. He toured Ireland to get a personal
acquaintance with conditions there.
While he put much of the blame for the inability of Ireland to support
its population on the big and often absent landlords, he found other problems
too, such as the lack of coal to form the basis of manufacturing, the size of
the population in relation to the productive capacity of the land (and
advocated emigration to solve this problem) and the reluctance of the peasantry
to changing their agricultural methods.
As with Scotland, he suggested that land nationalisation would be
appropriate if the landlords refused to carry out land improvement works. His pamphlet, “The Irish Land Question” took
the form of a letter to William Gladstone, then in his first premiership.
1871.
“Sermons and Lectures by William McCombie” (author – the collection was edited,
after the death of William McCombie, by his daughter, May, who died in 1874). When he acquired a house in Aberdeen, William
McCombie (1809) became a member of the John Street Baptist Church. On occasions when the minister was absent,
William often took charge of the service, including giving the sermon. The 29 sermons contained in this volume were
written between 1856, or thereby and 1870.
The volume also included two lectures.
There are no dates on the actual manuscripts and some of the individual
works appear to have been prepared in a hurry. The titles of the sermons are as follows. “Faith”, “Christ as the sacrifice”, Christ as
the sin-destroyer”, Christ as the source of the higher life”, “Christ the light
of men”, “The teaching of Christ”, “The origin of the spiritual life”,
“Spiritual freedom”, “Spiritual sonship”, “The two schemes of life”, “The life
of faith”, “True worship”, “The homage of the soul”, “The reconciliation of the
world to God”, “The law in the heart”, “Service”, “Striving”, “Faith and
works”, “He that believeth shall not make haste”, “Self-denial”, “The thorn in
the flesh”, “The Christian armour”, “The reproach of Christ”, “Ashamed of
Christ”, “The prodigal”, “Sin the great agent of destruction”, “The permanency
of moral habits”, “Overcoming” and “What is religion?”
It is clear from the above list of publications that William
McCombie (1809) never set out to write a book as such. Rather he wrote many shorter items, such as essays,
lectures, newspaper articles and sermons and then subsequently cobbled them
together to publish as books or pamphlets.
He clearly subscribed to the idea that God was beyond human
understanding. “Religion is not, either as to its object, or as to its
action on the mind, to be brought fully within the comprehension of the human
understanding, but that is no reason why we should cease to regard it
rationally.” He was aware of the long
history of the past stored in layers of the earth’s crust and the many
revolutions in nature revealed by this record, but he did not see such
information as impinging on his religious theorising. In “Christ the light of men” he dismissed the
idea propounded by some philosophers that life is just the result of the
operation of natural laws. “What is
life? We cannot tell. Even in the plant there is something that
eludes both our senses and our physical science. There is a class of philosophers in these
days who think they can dispense with a principal of life. It will not ordinate in their scheme of
positive science and they ignore it or cast it out. I should as soon think of ignoring the
principle of gravitation.” William
clearly subscribed to the idea of a “life force” which animated living things.
Mutual Instruction
Classes
“Mutual instruction” is a term which was originally used to
describe the monitorial system of education, developed by Bell and Lancaster
and introduced widely in the UK and in Continental Europe early in the 19th
century, as a means of providing cheap schooling for poor pupils. In this system the more able children (class
monitors) were used to teach the less able.
Another early 19th century development to bring
education to the masses was the introduction of Mechanics’ Institutes,
establishments which provided education, mostly to working men, usually in
technical subjects. The motive for this
innovation was partly to improve the technical skills of the workforce but also
to give working men an alternative in the evenings to intoxication and
gambling. The first Mechanics’ Institute was established
in 1821 by Leonard Horner, an Edinburgh businessman. This was followed by the Glasgow Mechanics’
Institute, which was founded by Dr George Birkbeck, a Yorkshireman who studied
Medicine at Edinburgh University before being appointed Professor of Natural
Philosophy at the Andersonian Institute in Glasgow (later to become the University of Strathclyde). In 1800, he provided free lectures on science
and technology for young working men and later, in 1823, he created a
Mechanics’ Institute in the city.
Mechanics’ Institutes were usually only sustainable in big
cities with at least some philanthropic employers, manufacturing industry and
large populations. However, the
principle of mutual instruction was later adopted in, and adapted to, other
social settings by a variety of organisations.
For example, in 1836 the Caledonian Mercury, commenting on a course of
chemistry lectures mounted by the Dalkeith Scientific Association, noted that
such associations were spreading across the country offering instruction to the
greater mass of the population and “affords a pleasing earnest of the dawn of
that bright era in the world’s history when all shall combine for mutual
instruction and when the lights of science shall dispel those clouds of
ignorance which still hover around man’s destiny, and cheer and brighten the
happy home of the humblest labourer and artisan in our free and happy land.” Provision of mutual instruction classes was
often sponsored by teetotal groupings, such as the Liverpool Total Abstinence
Society. In Windygates, Fife in 1837 the
Windygates Agricultural Association meeting “gave an opportunity for landlord
and tenant, producers and consumers to meet for mutual instruction in diffusing
knowledge of the best means of production.”
However, the most significant development in mutual
instruction was its introduction to the working class in small towns and
villages, not only as a means of gathering knowledge in any subject, but also
in gaining self-esteem, writing and presentation skills, and empowerment to
take their own initiatives. In 1842 it
was noted that the Wick and Pultneytown Young Mens’ Mutual Instruction Society
had increased to about 30 members which met every Monday evening. Any member
was at liberty to propose the discussion of an “edifying and instructing”
subject. The Society’s President then
nominated four members to give opinions of the subject on the succeeding
evening, either by written essay or by oral address. Unfortunately, not all young men were
immediately won over by this new movement.
The John O’Groats Journal lamented in 1845, “It is a pity indeed to see
so many young persons parading the streets at a time when they have an
opportunity of having their minds improved and having additions made to their
stock of knowledge for nothing.”
Rhynie Mutual
Instruction Class
The first Mutual Instruction Class identified in the North
East of Scotland was the Craibstone Class, Parish of Newhills, near Aberdeen. In 1842 it celebrated its first anniversary
with a soiree and ball on the evening of New Year’s Day. “Some neat and appropriate speeches” were
presented on the benefits of mutual improvement societies. Similar societies were in existence in
Macduff (Banffshire) and Tarves (Aberdeenshire) by 1844. But it was in 1846 that the most significant
development in mutual instruction occurred in Aberdeenshire, not close to the
city of Aberdeen but in the remote parish of Rhynie, which in 1841 had a
population of 1033. In the New
Statistical Account of Scotland of 1842, written by the minister of the Church
of Scotland, the parish was described as having “only” about 12 dissenting (ie Non-Conformist) families. But that was quite a high proportion, given
the small overall population of the parish.
Robert Harvey Smith was an intelligent lad, who was born into a
farming family in Rhynie and was only 20 when in 1846 he collected together
eleven other young men for a meeting and submitted a set of draft rules to them
for the formation of a Mutual Instruction Class. Robert would later attend university in
Aberdeen and graduate with a degree in Divinity. The rules of the class were debated by the
attendees and adopted, with some modifications.
The principal aim of the movement was mutual instruction of its members “by the reading of essays and criticisms
thereupon”. Members were fined one penny
if they were ten minutes late for a meeting “unless an excuse satisfactory to
the majority were given”. In addition to
member essays and talks, lectures by established speakers were also presented.
The Rhynie Mutual Instruction Class became very successful. Robert Harvey Smith recruited a dedicated
group of helpers who, over the next few years repeatedly supported the Class by
making presentations. The cohort
included Rev Alex Mackay, FRGS, Free Church schoolmaster, Rev George Stewart, Established
Church schoolmaster, Rev A Nicholl of the Congregational Church and John
Stuart, Free School, all Rhynie.
Schoolmasters and ministers were recruited from nearby parishes too,
such as Auchindoir, Kinnethmont, Huntly and Lumsden. In addition, local doctors and veterinarians gave
talks. It is remarkable that the
Congregationalists and the Free Church were so heavily involved and, just a few
years after the disruption of 1843, the Established Church also played its part
in this movement which was heavily dominated by the Non-Conformist churches. Rhynie was one of the few parishes in
Scotland where the Established Church incumbent was displaced.
The programme of lectures arranged for the Rhynie Mutual
Instruction class in the spring and early summer of 1847, mostly on science
subjects, was as follows. 1st
lecture Rev A Mackay, Free Church, Rhynie “Heat”. 2nd Lecture Dr Macdonald, Surgeon,
Huntly “Anatomy part 1”. 3rd
lecture Rev George Stewart, Established Church, Rhynie “Origin of
Language”. 4th lecture Rev H
Nicoll, Free Church, Auchindoir “Geology”.
5th lecture Rev A Nicoll, Congregational Church, Rhynie
“Astronomy”. 6th lecture Rev
D Rose, Free Church, Kinnethmont “Magnetism and Electricity”. 7th lecture R Troup jun,
Schoolmaster, Rhynie “Light”. 8th
lecture Rev A Mackay, Free Church, Rhynie “Laws of Motion”. 9th lecture Dr Macdonald, Surgeon,
Huntly “Anatomy part 2”.
At the end of 1847 the Rhynie Class held an evening festival
(such an event was often called a “soiree”) to celebrate the achievements of
the first year. During the evening nine
members of the class delivered their maiden speeches while the audience
“expressed their approbation of each speaker by successive bursts of
applause”. Rev Mr M’Kay and Rev Mr
Nicoll also gave enthusiastic addresses to the meeting. Such annual celebrations became a standard
feature, both at Rhynie and at other Mutual Instruction Classes. These events were usually preceded by tea and
the presentations were often followed by music or even by a ball.
While Mutual Instruction Classes were almost exclusively a
preserve of young males, who were mostly employed in manual work, and the ones
who were causing social problems through drinking and other disruptive
activities, in 1848 a class member, William McConnochy made a presentation on
“Female Education”. In 1851, the Aberdeen
and Banffshire Mutual Instruction Union (see below) mounted an essay
competition on “Female education and training etc”. The winner was farmer William Anderson of
Alford. The Forgue Mutual Instruction
Class in 1851 heard an address on “Female influence and education, and the
indifference of society about these” and in 1854 a similar class in Kinmuck received
a presentation on “Female influence and its value in the temperance
cause”. The Leith-Lumsden class
encouraged ladies to join Female Mutual Instruction Classes at their 1849
festival. This occasion was addressed by
William McCombie (1809). He was greeted
“with much applause”. Such egalitarian
ideas, which William espoused, were rare at this time.
Robert Harvey Smith was also instrumental in taking the
message of the Mutual Instruction Class to other parishes outwith Rhynie,
initially through a Corresponding Committee, established in 1847. Two years later this work was taken over by
the creation of the Aberdeen and Banffshire Mutual Instruction Union (ABMIU),
an umbrella body, at a meeting held in Rhynie, with Robert Harvey Smith as its
Chairman. Eighteen delegates from
existing classes attended, though other classes were unable to be represented. William McCombie (1809) of Cairnballoch
was elected as the first President of the ABMIU, though it was probably a
non-executive position. The entry on
William McCombie (1809) in the Dictionary of National Biography says, “He soon showed a taste for literature, and local debating
societies (presumably Mutual Instruction
Classes) gave him an opportunity of cultivating his talents”, but this can
hardly be true. Rhynie was the nearest
Mutual Instruction Class to Cairnballoch, lying about 11 miles distant by
road. By the time the Rhynie Class was
established in 1846, William was already 37 and had established his reputation
with a string of publications, the most prominent of which, “Hours of Thought”
had originally appeared in 1835. His
first known contribution as a speaker to the Rhynie class was in June 1849. It must have been the case that William was
elected President of the ABMIU because of his already established literary
reputation and his sympathy for rural self-help. He was a figurehead for this movement, an
illustration of what could be achieved in a farming community through
determination, allied with innate ability.
William McCombie (1809) of Cairnballoch was President or
Honorary President of the ABMIU between 1849 and at least 1856. The ABMIU had as its objective, “The cultivation of friendly feeling and sincere cooperation in
everything related to the interests of the Associated Mutual Instruction
Classes and the establishment of others in favourable localities”. To help promote its message, the ABMIU
published for six months in 1850 “The Rural Echo; and Magazine of the North of
Scotland Mutual Instruction Associations”.
It had a monthly circulation of more than 1,000 but appears not to have
reached a level of sustainability.
However, the ABMIU was still successful in spreading the message about
mutual instruction across the region. At
the 4th annual assembly of the Union, held at Forgue in 1853, the
following information was reported. The
constituent societies (Alford, Auchleven, Drumdollo, Essie, Gardenston, Grange,
Insch, Lumsden, Leochel-Cushnie and Rhynie) all pursued the self- and
mutual-instruction of their members and the intellectual improvement of the
people in their respective neighbourhoods.
They were all non-sectarian in their constitutions and collectively had
660 members, who had read 1177 essays or papers. They had raised twelve libraries containing
1206 volumes, presented 132 public lectures, with an average attendance of 120
and 40 social meetings with a mean audience of 210. Some papers, written entirely by members, had
been published and 10,260 copies of these distributed. This was a remarkable achievement and a major
contribution to the education of the rural working class in Aberdeenshire. William McCombie (1809) must have been proud
to be associated with such a worthy initiative.
William McCombie (1809) appears to have spoken three times
at meetings of the Rhynie class in 1849, 1850 and 1851. His 1849 contribution was particularly
noteworthy in presenting his opinions on mutual instruction. The Aberdeen Journal reported that, “After noticing the condition of farm servants and the
conduct of their masters to them, making some remarks on the bothy and large
farm systems and giving a gentle hint to smokers and snuffers he adverted to a
remark which fell from one of the speakers regarding the acquisition of
knowledge. He said that the mind should
not receive knowledge mechanically as the sponge takes up water and give it
forth again without being influenced by it, but as the lime shell which imbibes
it and becoming assimilated with it is fitted for fertilising the soil on which
it is spread. One of the lectures had
been on ghost-seeing – he trusted there would be but one other ghost seen in
Rhynie – the ghost of ignorance – departing as a certain traditional ghost once
did (Here Mr McCombie gave an account of this ghost and its last words amid
shouts of laughter). One speaker had
said that twelve Mutual Instruction Classes could now be seen from the Top o’
Noth (a local hill); they all knew the old rhyme – “The Buck, Belrinnes, Noth
and Bennachie, Are the four landmarks on this side the sea.” He had hoped these would speedily become
landmarks of an intellectual sea which would submerge ignorance and vice
beneath its waves. Top o’ Noth was
likely to become so, the others had yet not that honour.” (Top o’Noth lies close to Rhynie, the other
hills are respectively close to Keith, Dufftown and Inverurie). It was reported that William McCombie
had given “decidedly the speech of the evening was frequently interrupted by
bursts of applause and sat down amid loud cheers”. He was clearly admired by the working class
in this locality.
In September 1849 William McCombie
addressed the annual soiree of the Leith-Lumsden Class. “During the evening a glass of ginger wine
was handed round” – a highly atypical occurrence, as such meetings were usually
alcohol-free. William McCombie (1809)
addressed the meeting and he made his own position clear on the effect of
alcohol on intellectual activity. He
disagreed with Burns’ theory of wit “Leese me on drink”. He held to an older saying “When the drink’s
in the wit’s out”. William attributed
the demise of some associations to their being too narrow and associated with
drink, such as cattle shows. Also, a
distinguished literary man had told him that no one spoke sense after dinner. William
thought they should deal with the whole nature of man. He urged the young men on mutual instruction
courses that mere intellectual training was insufficient, but that the moral
and spiritual nature of man must also be cultivated.
William McCombie was also known to
have addressed several other organisations involved in adult education,
including the Clatt Mutual Instruction Class and the Huntly Mutual Instruction
Society, both in 1850, the Aberdeen Young Men’s Literary Union and the Aberdeen
Mechanics’ Institute, both in 1854, the Alford Mutual Instruction Society in
1855, the Oldmeldum Mechanics’ Institute in 1856, the Bon-Accord Literary
Society, the Free Gilcomston Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Association and at Huntly in 1857, at Aberchirder
and separately at Portsoy on “Money credit and banking” in 1858, and to the Banff Mutual Instruction
Society in 1859.
A brief history of Aberdeen newspapers
It is perhaps not surprising that
William McCombie (1809) should have begun to harbour thoughts of owning or
editing a newspaper as a means of propagating his personal philosophy on
religion, politics and social affairs, poetry and literature. But before delving
into William’s involvement in the local press in Aberdeen and more widely in
North East Scotland, it will first it be important to set the scene by briefly
recounting the history of Aberdeen’s newspaper titles.
The first Aberdeen newspaper was the
Aberdeen Journal which was initially published on 5th January 1748,
by Aberdeen printer James Chalmers. It
appeared as a weekly edition. During the
next 84 years several attempts were made to found rival organs, but none lasted
for long. It was not until 1832 that a
serious competitor came along in the form of the Aberdeen Herald and General
Advertiser (but generally known by the truncated title of the “Herald”). It was created by the fusion of the Aberdeen Gleaner
and the Chronicle. Fierce competition
for readers commenced between the Aberdeen Journal and its new rival. They were briefly joined by other would-be
competitors, the most notable of which was the North of Scotland Gazette (NSG)
in 1845 but none of the newcomers proved to be enduring titles. In 1841 Aberdeen, with a population of
67,000, had four weekly newspapers, the Journal (2300 circulation), Herald
2050, Banner 1200 and Constitutional 500.
The Banner (terminated 1851) and the Constitutional soon met their
demise in this clearly overcrowded newsprint market.
The Aberdeen Herald and General Advertiser
This newspaper was created in 1832
by the merger of the Aberdeen Gleaner and the Chronicle. Politically, the Herald supported the Whigs. Its first editor was John Powers, but he was
replaced by James Adam, who was characterised by being politically radical and
unafraid to criticise religious views, especially those of ministers of the
Established Church, which he did at the time of the Disruption in 1843. He supported the Chartists, a movement
dedicated to gaining political rights for the working classes, which was active
between 1838 and 1848. The demands in
their charter were universal male suffrage, secret ballots, equal-sized electoral
districts, abolition of property qualifications for MPs, payment of MPs and
annual parliaments. At this time there
was a strong Total Abstinence movement in Aberdeen, which was entrenched in the
evangelical Presbyterian churches. James
Adam was unsympathetic to abstinence and used to meet with his cronies in the
Lemon Tree tavern.
Ministers of Religion were often
outraged by the content of the Aberdeen Herald and, famously in 1841, James Adam
retaliated by seeking damages from Rev John Allan. It was claimed that Rev Allan had used the
words, “There is an infidel weekly publication or paper in Aberdeen edited by
an infidel, an infidel villain, a blasphemous villain, a low villain, a hired
agent for attacking the clergy, an agent of the devil, a Satanic agent.” William McCombie (1809) had been a supporter
of the Aberdeen Herald during the 1840s because of its Liberalism, but his
views on the newspaper must have been somewhat ambivalent. He was in tune with its political stance but
must have been uncomfortable with its irreligious tone. James Macdonell (a sometime reporter on the Free Press – see below), said of Adam “If he
wants that free and easy air respecting religion and that desperately witty
manner, which are characteristics of Mr A’s effusions, it has a depth of
meaning and a moral suggestiveness which to them is utterly foreign.” He further described James Adam as follows, quoting
from Hazlitt, “he is an honest man with a total want of principle”. Adam remained as editor of the Herald until
1862 when he was succeeded by Archibald Gillies.
The North
of Scotland Gazette
The prospectus for a new title, the North of Scotland
Gazette (NSG), was published in early 1845, which proposed a four-page, large-size,
weekly newspaper with content split equally between advertisements and commercial
intelligence on the one hand, and local and general news on the other. It was divided into two sections, the
advertisements to be distributed free and the news and commercial section
available by subscription. The annual fee
was £5 for which customers would receive both sections. It described its own policy in the following
terms. “In so far as general politics
are concerned, the Gazette preserves strict neutrality; but its columns exhibit
a concise yet comprehensive view of the varied and complicated movements of the
whole political system. Unbiassed by
party , it gives weekly a faithful and impartial record of Domestic and Foreign
Affairs, - the sole aim being to afford every necessary information to the
Politician to secure the countenance and patronage of the Man of Business, to
interest the Farmer as well as the Proprietor of the Soil, to instruct and
amuse the more General Reader, and in every way to make the Gazette a Complete
Family Newspaper.” It was proposed that
publication would start as soon as 700 subscriptions had been secured and this
point seems to have been reached about the end of March 1845 as the first
edition appeared on 1 April of that year.
The publisher / proprietor was William Bennett, a printer based at 42
Castle Street, Aberdeen.
Almost immediately the NSG got into a stooshie (disagreement) with two of its
rivals, the John O’Groats Journal and the Aberdeen Herald, over the appropriation
of paragraphs from those newspapers without acknowledgement, and the NSG then
seemed to labour to become economically viable.
Another rival, the Banner, the newspaper of the Free Church, was also
struggling for survival at about this time.
By 1847 the NSG had acquired Rev JH Wilson as its editor. He was a vice-president of the Total
Abstinence Society. Rev Wilson continued
in this role until at least 1851, though after that date he was no longer
listed as having a connection with the NSG in the Post Office Directory. He was succeeded by David Macallan (see
below), one of the newspaper’s proprietors, until 1853. The
great significance of the NSG was that it was taken over by a partnership of George
King, William McCombie (1809) and David Macallan in 1849. In political character it became a “decided
advocate of liberalism and voluntaryism”.
As part of the change in editorial policy, the editor of the NSG, JH
Wilson left the paper to become the Minister of the Albion Street Chapel,
Aberdeen. He departed with a £50 “golden
goodbye” from the proprietors. The new
owners clearly had their own political and social agenda and installed William
McCombie (1809) as the editor of the new paper in 1853. He supported disestablishment of the Church
of Scotland. Two subjects on which the
Free Press campaigned consistently were universal suffrage and the expansion of
secular education.
So, what was the background of the new owners (other than William
McCombie (1809)) and what did they have in common?
David
Macallan
David Macallan, a Baptist, was the
son of an Aberdeen ship’s captain, born about 1793, who himself took up the
trade of upholsterer, initially at 1 Martins Lane, but from 1835 at Strawberry
Bank, in the firm of Allan and Macallan.
He resigned from his business partnership in 1848 after the firm received
a Royal Warrant and he felt that, on principle, he could not sign an oath of
allegiance. David Macallan seems to have
been reasonably well-off. When he died
in 1858, his personal estate was stated at between £1,500 and £2,000 (£162,000
- £216,000 in 2018 money). The value of
his share in the newspaper co-partnery with George King and William McCombie
was estimated at the time at £53 (£5,725 in 2018 money). David Macallan devoted much of his time to
public life. He was a town councillor
for many years and took a strong interest in the welfare of the poor, for
example, contributing to the West Aberdeen Coal Fund, the Public Soup Kitchen,
the Albion Street Mission, the House of Refuge (for destitute persons), the
Aberdeen Lodging House Association, the Benevolent Fund for Female
Domestic Servants while labouring under sickness, the Industrial School
Association and the Aberdeen Property Investment Company. This last body was a private sector vehicle
set up to build adequate houses for the poor, which was also supported by
George King. David Macallan was a deeply
religious man and a member of the Auxiliary
Religious Tract Society.
George King
George King was born at Slains on
the north east coast of Aberdeenshire in 1797.
He was the son of a shoemaker, leather merchant and currier and this
line of business seemed to be his destiny too but, by 1827, he and his brother
Charles, who was born in 1800, had moved to Aberdeen. Charles set up as a furnishing tailor and
followed this business until he retired about 1856. George was initially described as a book agent
but from 1828 this changed to bookseller, often with additions to that enduring
title. Between 1831 and 1842 his
business was also as a stationer and between 1829 and 1842 the shop was also
the Depository of the Tract and Aberdeen Auxiliary Bible Societies. In 1843, on his brother Robert joining him,
the trading name changed to George and Robert King (G&R) and the Depository
function lapsed. In 1853 another brother
Arthur establishing his printing business (see below) and printing was dropped
by G&R. Although Robert had died in
1845, his name was retained in the title of the business until about 1864. By
1864 George King too had retired and the business was passed on to another
bookseller, James Murray.
George King’s bookshop, stationery
and publishing business in St Nicholas Street was well known to Aberdonians
with religious and social interests. In
addition to new books with a religious theme, pamphlets and sermons, he
frequently advertised books of poetry and lists of second-hand books which had
been passed to him for disposal. George
King was the publisher, in 1845, of “Memoirs of Alexander Bethune” by William
McCombie (see above). G&R were also
the publishers of Christian Sociology by the Rev John Peden Bell in 1853. Bell was a close friend of William McCombie
(1809). In the social sphere, George
King was a thorough-going liberal and abstainer. In 1847 he was the signatory of a letter to
Lord Provost Blaikie objecting to the provision of intoxicating liquor at
funerals. He subscribed to good causes such as the West
Aberdeen Coal Fund, the Aberdeen School of Industry for Girls, the relief of
the unemployed in the Aberdeen suburb of Woodside, the unemployed weavers in
Lancashire in 1862, the Boys’ School of Industry and the Model Lodging House. He was involved in the setting up of the Improved
House Accommodation Company Ltd in 1859, whose objective was the provision of
decent accommodation for the working classes.
Another housing initiative to receive his support was the Aberdeen
Property Investment Company which appeared to function like a building society
in taking deposits for interest and providing loans to members to build their
own heritable properties.
He was a member of Captain Dingwall-Fordyce’s (Liberal) election
committee in 1847. At the General
Election of 1852 he was a member of the committee supporting Mr Thomson who
stood for election to the constituency of the City of Aberdeen on a platform of
“progressive reform” and in 1855 he supported the candidacy of Colonel Sykes. George King was for many years a member, then
the chairman, of the Old Machar Parochial Board where he took a particular
interest in the relief of the poor. He
wrote a tract “Modern Pauperism and the Scottish Poor Laws” in 1871 and
at one time he was chairman of the Old Machar Poorhouse. In
religion George King was a Congregationalist and was a trustee of the
Congregational Chapel in George Street.
He was heavily involved in the building of a new Congregational Chapel
in Belmont Street in 1864 and he was also a member of the London Missionary
Society.
Unsurprisingly, George King was
opposed to slavery in America and was instrumental, along with William McCombie
(1809) and his cousin James Bain McCombie, in establishing the Freedman’s Aid
Society in 1865. The purpose of this
body was to promote the work of an anti-slavery delegation from America to the
religious community in Aberdeen. In
addition to his main business of bookselling, he had other business interests
from time to time, such as partner in a flesher business and he was a
shareholder in the Aberdeen Music Hall Ltd and various other companies. His non-business interests included the
Volunteer Artillery and Rifle Association and antiquarian studies (he was
elected a Fellow of the Society of Scottish Antiquaries in 1870). George King was also a member of the Spalding
Club, which was devoted to antiquarian studies in Aberdeenshire. When he died in 1872, George King left a
personal estate of £3,821 (about £428,000 in 2018 money). He also owned number 19, Carden Place, an
upmarket residential street in Aberdeen.
Robert King
Robert King was born in 1811 in
Banff. He started a bookshop and
printing business in Peterhead but, in 1843, Robert went into partnership with
brother George, as George and Robert King, based in St Nicholas Street,
Aberdeen, with a separate printing works in Golden Square and, from 1849, in
Flourmill Lane. Robert was also an
accomplished writer but, sadly, died in 1845. Shortly before his demise, G&R published “The Covenanters in the North”, Robert’s
best-known work. (Robert’s son,
also George, became a distinguished botanist and doctor in the Indian Army, who
worked on the extraction of quinine (for treating malaria) from the Chinchona
tree, and the distribution of the drug throughout India via the postal service,
for which he received several honours).
Arthur King
Arthur King was another brother of
George, Charles and Robert, though the youngest of the four, having been born
at Peterhead in 1815. About 1835 he too
joined the printing trade and served a seven-year apprenticeship as a
compositor, presumably with Robert King in Peterhead. After completing his training, Arthur worked
for a short while for the Aberdeen Banner and on his own account before setting
up as a printer by 1843. At the 1851
Census of Scotland, Arthur’s trade was described as printer and compositor.
The Aberdeen Free
Press
According to the obituary written by James Macdonell, “For many years he (William McCombie (1809)) had strongly felt the need of a local
newspaper which should be at once decidedly Liberal and earnestly
Christian. The need was the more
impressive because the Aberdeen Herald was then edited by a very clever and reckless
man (James Adam – see above) who
constantly poured ridicule on all religious earnestness and whose writing was
made formidable by its broad humour and its force of style.
The first stage in the process of creating an alternative
journalistic organ had been the purchase of the struggling NSG and the change
of editorial direction in 1849. The
second stage had been the replacement of the NSG with a new publication, the
Aberdeen Free Press and North of Scotland Review (generally abbreviated
to “Free Press”) in 1853. This title was
modified in 1855 to “Aberdeen Free Press, Peterhead, Fraserburgh and Buchan
News and North of Scotland Advertiser”, though this title change was reversed
in 1869. The owners of the Free Press
were David Macallan, William McCombie, George King and Arthur King. The following abstract from the Aberdeen
Herald in March 1853 is the announcement by Arthur King of the impending change. “Arthur King and Co, Printers Broad
Street respectfully intimate to the public that in place of the North of
Scotland Gazette which in consequence of a partial change in the proprietary (presumably the admission of Arthur King to
the partnership) is to be discontinued, they will commence publishing on 6th
May ensuing in a considerably enlarged size and under the same editorial
superintendence “The Aberdeen Free Press and North of
Scotland Review”. The Free Press
will be conducted on the same general principles as the “North of Scotland
Gazette” has been for the last four years.”
Arthur King & Co
In June 1852 Arthur King placed the
following notice in the Aberdeen Journal.
“Arthur King, Printer, begs respectfully to intimate to the
inhabitants of Aberdeen and its vicinity that he has commenced commercial
business in the above line in those central premises 2 ½ Broad Street (second
floor) where he will devote his attention to general printing including Book,
Pamphlet and Jobbing work.” He was the sole
partner in the company. Arthur
King’s business was much more extensive that the publication of the Free Press. He developed a high reputation as a book
printer and became the printer for the Aberdeen University Press. But in 1869 he both moved premises and ceased
to be the printer and publisher of the newspaper. “Arthur King & Co Printers beg to
intimate that with a view to secure extended accommodation for their largely
increased general printing business they have taken a lease of those premises
Clark’s Court, Upperkirkgate, to which they will remove at the end of the month
of July ensuing. Ceasing by mutual agreement its connection with the Aberdeen
Free Press.” What caused the split with
his other partners is presently unclear.
The Free Press then undertook its own printing of the newspaper. However, successful though he was as a
printer Arthur ran into trouble three years later when he overtraded and ran
out of capital. He had to grant a trust
deed over his assets in favour of his creditors. The business was put up for sale and then acquired
by the company’s foreman, William McKenzie and continued in a successful
way. In marked contrast to his brother
George, Arthur King seems to have been almost exclusively focussed on his
business and not much interested in civic or social matters. Arthur died in 1882.
William McCombie
(1809)’s editorship of the Free Press
It is not known how William
McCombie came to meet George King and David Macallan but, from the above review
of the background of his two partners, they clearly possessed common interests
in religion and religious books, social policy and literature and it is likely
that these shared themes brought them together, perhaps initially on William
McCombie’s occasional forays to Aberdeen on farm business, when he would likely
have stocked up on books, at religious meetings, or on occasions when he was
addressing mutual instruction classes, or similar associations, or when he
sought a publisher for his first work, “Hours of Thought”, which reached the
bookshops in 1835.
William McCombie (1809) was editor of the Aberdeen Free
Press from its introduction in 1853 until his death in 1870. James Macdonell said of this development, “Untrained
in the ways of journalism and despising some of its traditions, he tended for a
time to write over the heads of his readers.
The leading articles which he penned in the seclusion of Cairnballoch,
or in the quiet study of his town house (latterly
9 Broadfold Place) too often bore traces of the metaphysical atmosphere in
which they had been conceived. Readers
who pined for the personality and the hard hitting which distinguished the
provincial press (eg from the Aberdeen
Herald) were often dragged against their will through a thicket of ethical
and philosophical principles. Like most
men with a decided turn and aptitude for metaphysical thought, Mr McCombie
found it difficult to discuss any subject without a reference to first principles. He constantly sought an ethical or a
philosophical basis on which to rear the slightest superstructure of Imperial
or Ecclesiastical policy.” And, “If Mr
McCombie thus limited the number of his readers, he gave a new moral dignity
and a new tone of intellect to the journalism of Northern Scotland by the
subjects which he chose for discussion, by his philosophical habit of treatment
and by the noble morality of his creed.”
It clearly took William McCombie some time to come to terms with his new
role and to recognise that his readers would likely cease to subscribe if the
content of the paper was above or beyond their intellectual grasp.
The circulation of the Free Press encompassed the counties of Aberdeen, Kincardine, Forfar, Banff,
Moray, Nairn, and Inverness. In 1855 the Free Press had a
circulation of only 731 against 3885 for the Journal and 3067 for the Herald. The Free Press had to struggle for its place
in the market for newspapers in Aberdeen and the surrounding country,
especially with the Herald, but by 1865 its circulation had risen to about 2500. The Aberdeen Journal had a clearly separate
editorial stance being a supporter of the Conservatives and the Established
Church. However, the Free Press
gradually gained ground on its two larger rivals. Stamp Duty on newspapers had kept their cost
high but in 1855 this tax was abolished.
Also, taxation of advertising was eliminated. Then, in addition to the regular edition of
the Free Press, published on Friday, price 4 ½ pence, a second edition, really
a cut down version of the Friday edition was published the following
Tuesday. This new edition was priced at
3 ½ pence and was known as the “Penny Free Press”. It continued for eight months. In 1865 the Free Press again moved to
producing two separate editions per week and in 1872 this increased to daily
publication, but still with a weekly version.
It was not until1876 that the Aberdeen Journal moved to daily
publication, on its ownership moving to a limited company structure. The Aberdeen Herald went into decline and in
1876 it was absorbed into the weekly edition of the Aberdeen Free Press. Competition then continued between the
Aberdeen Journal and the Aberdeen Free Press until 1922 when the two merged
under the title of the Aberdeen Press and Journal (see below).
William
Alexander (1826 – 1894)
William McCombie (1809) was aided in the growth of the Free Press
by the recruitment of some outstanding journalistic talent, the most important
of which was William Alexander (1826 – 1894).
William was born on the farm of Westerhouses, Rescivet, Chapel of
Garioch, Aberdeenshire. He was the
eldest of ten children and his father James was a farmer and blacksmith. William Alexander had only a basic school
education at Daviot and at an early age went to work on his father’s farm,
another “ferm loon” destined to follow in his father’s footsteps. At the age of 20, William suffered a severe
injury on the farm and had to have a leg amputated, which necessitated a
revision of his career intentions.
During a long recuperation he taught himself shorthand and extended his
basic education. It quickly became
apparent that William Alexander had substantial literary talent. At the time of the 1851 Census of Scotland,
William Alexander, despite his disability, was still working on his father’s
50-acre farm. However, through mutual
instruction classes, he came into contact with William McCombie (1809), when he
won an essay competition on farm servants.
McCombie gave him a thorough
grounding in “the leading philosophical tendencies of the age”. William McCombie then offered William
Alexander a job as a journalist, which must initially have been on the NSG, in
the autumn of 1852. He wrote under the
pseudonym “Rusticus”. This paper was replaced
by the Aberdeen Free Press in May 1853.
William Alexander was first listed in the Post Office Directory of
Aberdeen in 1858, when he was described as “Reporter (Free Press Office)”. This status was maintained until 1863. Between 1864 and 1870, William’s status was
raised to “Sub-Editor (Free Press Office)”.
William McCombie (1809), the first editor of the Free Press died in post
in 1870 and William Alexander was appointed in his place. From listings in the Post Office Directory, he
retired in turn about 1876 and from 1877, while his connection to the newspaper
was maintained, he had no special title.
Like William McCombie (1809), William Alexander espoused radical
views on the social organisation of land and promoted the rights of tenant
farmers through the newspaper. He was an
elder of the Free Church. William
Alexander was also a member of Aberdeen Philosophical Society and the New
Spalding Club. When the Institute of
Journalists was formed in 1884, he became president of the Aberdeen branch.
William Alexander (1826 - 1894)
William
Alexander as author
His position on the staff of a weekly newspaper gave William
Alexander the opportunity to write creatively and to have his novels published,
initially by serialisation, in the pages of the Free Press. In the mid-19th century the
working language of most of the rural Aberdeenshire population was the Doric
and William’s work was written in a mixture of raw, uncompromising Doric and
English. He progressively developed his
reputation, which was always greatest in his native county, partly because of
the use of the native dialect, partly due to his descriptions of rural life,
but also due in some measure because of the artistic quality of his creations. Sketches of Rural Life in Aberdeenshire first appeared in the Aberdeen Free Press during 1853
and The Authentic History of Peter Grundie was published in
the Penny Free Press in
1855. His other publications
included - “The Laird of Dammochdyle” (1865), “Johnny Gibb of Gushetneuk in the
Parish of Pyketillim” (1869 – 1870), “Sketches of life among my ain folk”
(1875), “Notes and Sketches illustrative of northern rural life in the
eighteenth century” (1877), “Twenty-five years: a personal retrospect” (1878),
“Memoir of the late Andrew Jervie” (with JG Mackie) (1879), A study of the
Rinderpest outbreak of 1865 – 1855 (1882), “Mrs Garden: a memorial sketch”
(1887), “The making of Aberdeenshire” (1888).
“Johnny Gibb” was his most famous oevre. After being serialised, it was published in
book form in 1871 and then went through many editions, such was its
appeal. Even today, it is one of the
most popular works of fiction employing the Doric.
James
Macdonell
James Macdonell was born in 1842 at Dyce, near Aberdeen. His father, a Highlander and a Roman Catholic
worked for the Excise, in consequence of which the Macdonell family moved from
place to place during James’ formative years.
James’ mother, Rachel, in contrast to his father, was a Protestant. While the family was based in Inverness,
Rachel Macdonell taught young James to read and he showed an early affinity
with the written word. However, he did not
take to school lessons and his education was advanced by the Rhynie Mutual
Instruction Class when the family was based in this remote parish. James joined the class on 3 December 1857
when he was 15 and is known to have read at least three papers, on “Light
Periodical Literature”, “Dress” and “Public Opinion”. James also started to learn French, which
would serve him well in his future career as a journalist.
Sadly,
James Macdonell’s father developed rheumatic fever, which led to heart
disease. He moved the family to Aberdeen,
but he died there in 1858. James then
took a job as a clerk in Alexander Pirie’s paper
mills at Stoneywood near Dyce. (The last functioning paper mill in Aberdeen
still occupies this site). He
blossomed in the more open and cultured life of the city, but this environment
also caused him to question the tenets of his Roman Catholic faith, which issue
had already been stirred in Rhynie, due to the mix of religions in his home,
where he had argued with his father. James was introduced to William McCombie
(1809) by Dr Peter Smith of Rhynie and Macdonell and McCombie immediately took
to each other. McCombie had a great
intellectual influence on the young James Macdonell and, realising his potential,
recruited him to make contributions to the Aberdeen Free Press. James Macdonell never had a fixed position on
the staff of the newspaper but worked for the Revenue, writing in his spare
time. In both the 1861 and 1862 editions
of the Post Office Directory for Aberdeen, James was listed as “Officer of the
Inland Revenue”, while continuing his side-line as a journalist. He gave up his
Roman Catholicism and joined the John Street Chapel which was the meeting place
for a very active group of Aberdonians with intellectual inclinations. James
Macdonell wrote a series of articles on his new perception of the Roman
Catholic faith, which were published in the Free Press. The first was entitled “Romanism and some of
the sources of its strength”. In
December 1860 James Macdonell reviewed the autobiography of Carlyle of Inveresk
for the newspaper.
But all
was not well with the editor. William
McCombie had suffered from ill-health for some time, due to a lung condition
and in June 1861, James Macdonell wrote. “Mr McCombie’s health which for years
has been delicate has at last fairly given way.
Continued brain work with hardly any intermission for years has reduced
his strength to the lowest ebb. The
result has been a command from his medical adviser to proceed to the Continent
without delay. He starts for Geneva on
Wednesday next with two of his family.
In his absence I have consented to write the leaders for the Free Press
… I am glad to have the opportunity of making some return for his oft-repeated
kindness to me. … This week two articles of mine will appear one on “The Indian
Budget” and the other on “American Slavery”.
The one on “Vagrancy” is by the sub-Editor (William Alexander)”. Clearly,
every crisis is somebody’s opportunity!
After his father’s death, James Macdonell felt his responsibility
as head of his family, consisting of his mother and her nine children. James now wanted and needed a full-time career
as a journalist and, as a consequence of his journalistic work and a lady acquaintance,
Mrs Baker, that he met through the John Street Chapel, he gained an
introduction to the Edinburgh Daily Review.
Unsurprisingly, since he had made his mark so rapidly at the Aberdeen
Free Press, he was taken on and thus became a full-time newspaper employee. He left Aberdeen and his close association
with William McCombie (1809) but he made clear in the obituary of his former
mentor, published in The Spectator in 1870, that McCombie’s influence upon him
had been profound. James Macdonell
enjoyed an illustrious journalistic career.
After the Edinburgh Daily Review, he became editor of the Northern Daily
Express (at the age of 22), then had a staff position on the Daily Telegraph
and finally became a leader writer on The Times. He died in London in 1879.
James Macdonell (1842 - 1879)
Andrew
Halliday (Duff)
Other notable journalists recruited to the Aberdeen Free Press by
William McCombie included George Murray (see above), based in Peterhead and
Andrew Halliday, who was engaged as the paper’s London correspondent. Andrew Halliday (Duff) was the son of Rev
William Duff and was born at Marnoch, Banffshire in 1830. Andrew was educated at Marischal College,
Aberdeen. From 1830 he lived in London,
where he discarded the “Duff” surname.
He wrote for Cornhill Magazine but was also well-known for his dramatic
work, for example, he adapted “David Copperfield” successfully for the
stage. He died in 1877.
William
Watt
William Watt was an Alford weaver who had literary tastes, having
been a founder of the Alford Literary Society and a vigorous promoter of the
ABMIU. William McCombie recruited him as
a reporter and reviewer on the staff of the Aberdeen Gazette in early
1853. He then moved on to the Free Press
but sadly died in 1854, aged 31. William
McCombie praised him in the Free Press for “his
steady and enthusiastic devotion to self-education and the acquisition of
knowledge, and for his discriminative taste and profound love of truth …”.
William
Carnie
William Carnie was born in Aberdeen in 1825 but received little
formal education. He was apprenticed to
an engraver and advanced his education through classes at the Mechanics’
Institute. William also proved to have
musical talents, and these were developed through his membership of the West
Church. In 1849 he was recruited as a
reporter for the NSG and in 1852 took on the role of reporter and sub-editor on
the Aberdeen Herald. Later he became the
drama critic of the Free Press, a role he fulfilled for many years.
The style,
content and layout of the Free Press
This weekly newspaper consisted of
eight pages and the content has been summarised under the following
topics. Advertisements (constituting about 25%
of its space), money markets, home news, foreign news (rather sketchily
treated), commercial list, poetry, births, marriages and deaths, shipping news,
commerce and manufacturers, agriculture (strongly represented), horticulture,
serial fiction, biography, memoirs, history, temperance reform, voluntaryism,
rural life, sketches, new unions and societies, Olympic Games, political
parties, monuments, famous people, Boer War and popular events. The paper “Circulates
amongst the middle and operative classes in the North of Scotland, an
agricultural, trading and manufacturing district"
In its early years, the last
page was where the editor indulged his interests in literature, philosophy,
science, religion and church news. This
page was also the venue where readers aired their views, often in indignant
terms, with the editor frequently adding his own comments at the end of a
letter. For example, in the edition of 5
January 1855 contained a very long and forthright letter on the immorality of
ordinary Aberdonians. The editor then questioned
if Aberdeen really was “the worst city in Britain” in this regard, as claimed
by the correspondent. The perils of
alcohol consumption were a frequent theme and the 9 February 1855 edition had a
long article on the problems of boozing throughout Scotland, written by
“Aliquis”. Thoughtful book reviews were
a prominent feature of the paper, often contributed by William McCombie’s
Non-conformist minister friends. The
paper supported the Free Church and also contained news of events in the United
Presbyterian and Congregationalist churches.
It was clear that the content of the Free Press was aimed at a
group which included working men in the towns and countryside, and also the
tenant farmers. In this last respect,
William McCombie’s familiarity with agricultural issues and the prominence they
received in the newspaper helped it to advance its popularity in the
countryside. In the 16 March 1855 paper,
a correspondent suggested the institution of a Mechanics’ Fair annually in
Aberdeen to display the inventions of working men. Emigration was another theme. In the 30 March edition, there was
information on wage rates in Canada and the United States and Thomas McCombie
(1819), a brother of William McCombie (1805) of Tillyfour, who became a
colonial administrator in Melbourne, authored several articles on Australia,
including immigrant remuneration. During
early 1855 the editor also included a substantial series of articles on life
assurance and its benefits. Other themes
given an airing, which were close to William McCombie’s heart, were the need to
improve the education of young male farm labourers and the lack of spare time
for young female servants to do likewise.
Was
William McCombie a part-time editor?
William McCombie (1809) retained his farm at Cairnballoch during
his editorship on the Aberdeen Free Press and he could “go weeks without entering the office”. But he had recruited some very able
journalists to the paper, particularly William Alexander, who were capable of producing
the newspaper in his absence. It should
be born in mind that the Free Press was a weekly paper throughout much of his editorship and
there was no pressing need for William to be present in Aberdeen every working
day. It is also known that many of his
literary contributions were penned at Cairrnballoch and he received draft
leading articles and other communications at home on a regular basis Travelling the 30 or so miles from Alford to
Aberdeen would have been time-consuming, so it would have made sense for the
journey to be undertaken only when necessary.
The “Vale of Alford coach ran daily into Aberdeen and was revived under
a new partnership in 1852. It ceased in
1859 on the opening of the Aberdeen to Alford Railway. However, without his dedicated and able staff
William McCombie’s semi-detached editorial status would probably not have
delivered success.
William
McCombie (1809)’s farming activities
Cairnballoch farm consisted on about 115 acres. In 1841 it employed four servants or
labourers, in 1851, five and in 1861, four.
Most of the farm servants seemed to live in the farmhouse. The farm was a mix of arable and pasture land
and cattle production was a significant endeavour. About 1867, William McCombie (1809) gave up
Cairnballoch farm and moved to the tenancy of another farm, Milton of Kemnay, which
possessed better agricultural land. It
consisted of 200 acres, all but 5 acres being arable. William McCombie (1809) had a herd of polled
black cattle, later to be called “Aberdeen Angus”, like his namesakes, the
lairds of Tillyfour and Easter Skene. However, unlike his more famous
cattle-breeding cousins, William (1809) shunned the showring. But he did buy breeding stock from famous
breeders, such as two cows from William McCombie (1805)’s Bridgend farm in 1850
and another cow obtained from Mr Kelly of Mains of Bowie in 1858. He also occasionally bred prize-winning
stock. At the 1858 Highlands and
Agricultural Show, the most prestigious in Scotland, which was held that year
in Aberdeen, William McCombie of Tillyfour won a first prize with a polled ox produced
by his namesake at Cairnballoch.
Between about 1850 and 1870, when he died, William McCombie of
Cairnballoch led a split life. On the
one hand he was a cattle farmer near Alford, partaking in all the rural
activities associated with this largely uneducated but highly practical group
of men, but on the other hand, he was associated with liberal-leaning
newspapers and moved in cultured and educated circles in Aberdeen. He seemed to manage this dual life with
ease. To illustrate the kind of rural
life that William McCombie (1809) led it is tempting again to turn to William
Alexander and the tale of “Johnny Gibb of Gushetneuk”, this time for a
description of the annual cattle show.
Typically
held in summer, the cattle show was a great occasion for the agricultural
community. The show ground was littered with canvas booths, supplying food and
drink to attendees. Show cattle were judged
by experts from other parishes, usually farmers or cattle dealers, to avoid
partiality, and the cattle were divided into categories. Show officials, in the main sporting Highland
dress, busied themselves, and the local laird was often present, exchanging
pleasantries with his tenants. After the
winners of the general classifications had been decided, there were sometimes
challenge cups to be awarded for the best male and best female breeding cattle. Such cups were retained by anyone winning a
competition for three years in a row. The
show was followed by dinner in a large canvas marquee, but only men were
present. The laird, kilted, was usually the chairman, assisted by a croupier, a
senior farmer or other person of status in the community, and the Parish parson
sat on the right of the laird. The
following quote is taken directly from William Alexander on the appearance of
such cattle breeders. “A hale-looking
man of Herculean build, not under 70 years of age.” (This is
very likely to have been a description of either William McCombie of Tillyfour
or William McCombie of Easter Skene, both of whom were prominent, of great
height and regularly officiated at cattle show dinners around Alford). Such gatherings were always followed by
speeches and toast-making. The toast
list was “a paper of portentious length”, starting with “The Queen” and
progressing by stages to all and sundry.
Each toast, drunk in whisky toddy, required a reply from the recipient
of the compliments. As the evening
progressed the hum of conversation grew louder.
The winner of the challenge cup was typically a farmer wearing “hodden
grey”. (Hodden grey was a hard-wearing, undyed, wool fabric favoured by
north-east farmers. William McCombie of
Tillyfour even wore his suit of hodden grey in Parliament.) By now well-lubricated, the meeting would
often then proceed to singing. When the
dinner party finally broke up, about half of the attendees would gravitate to
the local inn, many smoking pipes. The winners
of the cups would then be expected to pay for more drinks and the cups would be
filled and emptied repeatedly. By this
time the party was very noisy, with speech, song, smoke and incoherent talk of beasts
and their breeding. The occasion ended
in late evening, the farmers then riding home on their ponies, which not infrequently resulted
in accidents along the way.
William McCombie and charitable causes
While many
in William McCombie (1809)’s circle in Aberdeen were deeply involved in
charitable acts and William gave to good causes from time to time, he was not
prominent in such matters. He did
contribute to the Patriotic Fund for the relief of widows and orphans of
soldiers, sailors and marines who were killed in the Crimean War (1853 – 1856)
and he also contributed to a fund dedicated to relieving distress amongst the
unemployed in Lancashire in 1862. In
this year too, he served as a Manager of the Aberdeen Royal Infirmary,
effectively a fund-raiser. A more
esoteric appeal which also gained William’s support was the funding of a new
peal of bells in St Nicholas’ Church, Aberdeen.
William McCombie’s family
William
McCombie (1809) married Ann Robertson in 1840.
She was the sister of an eminent Aberdeen antiquary, Dr Joseph
Robertson, a co-founder of the Spalding Club in 1842, which was dedicated to
antiquarian studies in Aberdeenshire.
Joseph Robertson also had a spell as editor of a series of newspapers,
the Aberdeen Courier (publication dates unknown), the Aberdeen Constitutional
(existed from 1837 – 1844), the Glasgow Constitutional (editor 1843 – 1849) and
the Edinburgh Courant (editor 1849 – 1853).
He died in 1866. It is to be
wondered if Ann Robertson’s brother was influential, directly or indirectly, in
awakening in William McCombie’s imagination the idea of starting a newspaper.
William
McCombie (1809) and his wife Ann had a family of seven, two girls and five
boys. It should not be surprising, given
the intellectual interests of the parents, that all the children would develop along
similar lines. The eldest child, Mary
(known as May) was born in 1841. She
never married and died at the early age of 33 from a lung condition, having
spent her last winter in Menton in the south of France to try to gain relief
from her symptoms. James Macdonell was a close confidant. He encouraged May to write about her
father. “The story of your father’s life
ought to be told without delay. It
should be told in connection with a description of the class from which he sprang;
of Scottish religious life; of Scottish education as given in parish schools;
of Scottish politics and Scottish farming.” James
Macdonell promised May assistance in this task and he also offered to write a
chapter containing his reminiscences of her father. William McCombie (1809) died in 1870 and,
until her death four years later, May McCombie was closely involved in the
management of the Aberdeen Free Press.
The Aberdeen Journal said of May after her death, “She had rare
abilities and high culture, which she devoted to various public questions of
the day, particularly those regarding her own sex.”
The second
child of William McCombie (1809) and his wife, Ann, was Annie born in
1842. She was very close to her father
and acted as his amanuensis (literary
assistant). Like her sister May, she
was close to James Macdonell and when Macdonell was absent from Aberdeen
working for the Excise he communicated with William McCombie via Annie. In one letter he told Annie that he was
determined to become a journalist and this message was no doubt passed back to
her father. James Macdonell also urged Annie,
like her sister and at about the same time, to write an account of her father’s
life. “Although your father’s life was
not eventful there is no reason why the story should lack the element of
personal incident and anecdote and trait.
Much must be said about Scottish religious life, Scottish education,
Scottish politics, and Scottish farming; but even these subjects admit of being
lighted up by details of Scottish personality and indeed the book need not be
darkened by a single page of dry or bare disquisition.” Sadly, that biography, if it was ever started
by either daughter, was never completed.
Annie
married Henry Alexander, the brother of William Alexander of “Johnny Gibb” fame,
at Milton of Kemnay (the McCombies’ new
farm), in 1874. Henry, the junior of
brother William by 16 years, was originally destined to be an engineer and
worked in this capacity for some time in both Aberdeen and Glasgow. However, he suffered a workshop accident,
which resulted in the loss of an eye and that caused him to change career
direction to more literary pursuits.
This incident has a remarkable parallel with the life of his brother
William who lost a leg as a young man, a fateful event which caused him, too,
to turn to literature. Annie died in
1905.
William
McCombie (1844) was the eldest son in the family. He went to work for the Free Press and became
a sub-editor. Later, he emigrated to
Canada and took up fruit farming. He
died, aged 98, in Vancouver in 1935.
Joseph
McCombie was born in 1846 and at the age of 15 was a student at Aberdeen
University. He became a curator at Register House, Edinburgh. Sadly, he died of a fever (typhoid?) at the
early age of 24.
Charles
McCombie the third son of William McCombie (1809) and his wife Ann, entered the
world in 1847. He was another young man
of promise who died early, at Strathpeffer in 1872. He was a student at the time and had not
recently been receiving medical care, though it seems likely he was at
Strathpeffer seeking a cure for his pulmonary tuberculosis.
Henry
Durward McCombie, the fourth son, was born at Cairnballoch in 1849. He took over the tenancy of Milton of Kemnay
on the death of his father in 1870. Henry
was politically active and the President of the West Aberdeenshire Radical
Association. In 1881 he organised a
public meeting in Kemnay concerning the agricultural crisis, in association
with the local Free Church minister. HD
McCombie was in the chair. Tenant
farmers were having a hard time due to agricultural prices dropping, but with
no concomitant change in the rents that they were paying, and Henry Durward
McCombie led the calls for law reform to ease the situation. He subsequently became a County Councillor in
1890 on the constitution of Aberdeenshire County Council and for nine years he
was its convener. Henry Durward was also
a Scottish Nationalist and argued for Home Rule.
John
McCombie was born in 1850 and studied Medicine at Aberdeen University before
pursuing a career in England. At the
1881 Census of England he was Medical Superintendent of the Deptford Smallpox
Hospital. By 1901 he had moved on to
take the post of Medical Superintendent of the Brook Hospital, Shooters Hill,
Kent. In 1911 John McCombie was the Medical
Superintendent of North Western Hospital, Hampstead which held 350 acute fever
patients at the time of the Census.
William McCombie (1809) and politics
After the
Great Reform Act of 1832 and the following General Election of 1832 – 1833,
Aberdeen was a single Burgh constituency, until 1885 when it was split into
two, Aberdeen North and Aberdeen South.
Likewise, Aberdeenshire returned a single MP between 1832 and 1874. For the first time in the General Election of
the latter year, Aberdeenshire was split into two constituencies, West and
East, and returned two MPs. Between 1832
and 1874 Aberdeen always voted in a Whig or Liberal candidate but Aberdeenshire
was a Tory/Conservative stronghold in the two decades following the reforms to
the electorate in 1832. In 1854,
Aberdeen returned a Liberal MP, though a Conservative was elected at a
by-election in 1861. At the general
elections of 1865, 1868 and 1874, the city of Aberdeen returned Liberal members. Thus, Aberdeenshire was staunchly Liberal
after 1832, while Aberdeen was initially Tory/Conservative but progressively,
from 1854, also became a Liberal-supporting constituency. It has been argued that this switch in
political preference in Aberdeenshire was influenced by the Aberdeen Free Press
and its (ultimately) Liberal-supporting editor.
This suggestion is plausible, though the name of William Alexander
should be joined with that of William McCombie (1809), bearing in mind the role
he played in substituting for McCombie and in driving up the circulation
figures for the Free Press.
However, William
McCombie (1809)’s political allegiance appears to have wavered over the years. A general election meeting was held in
Aberdeen in 1857 which was addressed by Colonel William Henry Sykes, the
Liberal candidate. Sykes had pursued a
very successful career in India with the Indian Army. He was also distinguished as an indologist,
ornithologist and statistician, being a founder of the Royal Statistical
Society. William McCombie (1909)
attended the election meeting and, after Sykes’ address, William was the first
to his feet to ask a question. “Does Col Sykes approve of the action taken by the
East India Company in promoting the growth of the poppy and opium smuggling
into China?” The audience greeted this
hostile question with “great laughter, cheers and hisses”. Sykes started his answer by admitting, “Your
question is a very difficult one no doubt …”.
Unlike modern politicians, Sykes did not dissemble. He was in favour of opium poppy cultivation “because
we could not prevent it”. This blunt
answer caused pandemonium in the hall.
Up jumped McCombie to continue skewering Sykes. “I think Col Sykes has misunderstood me. The question was, whether Col Sykes approves
of the action taken by the East India Company in promoting the growth of the
poppy?” Sykes ploughed on, justifying
not only the cultivation of the poppy but also the export of opium to China, on
the grounds that it was no concern of the Government where it went after export
or what use was made of it. In any case,
“We are all Free Traders, you know …” and opium did not really harm people, “Opium
does not destroy the health, does not excite the passions, as gin does. It does just the reverse – sends people to
sleep.” McCombie knew full well that
opium was devastating the health of Chinese labourers and he was unimpressed by
the blasé approach of this august colonial
administrator. It appears that on this
occasion his humanitarian principles trumped any warmth towards Sykes as a
fellow Liberal.
There was a byelection in 1861 in Aberdeenshire, where the two
candidates were Mr William Lesley of Warthill, for the Liberals, and the Hon.
Arthur Gordon, for the Conservatives.
Both candidates gathered together and published membership of their
election committees, consisting of high-profile supporters. William McCombie of Cairnballoch, remarkably,
supported the Conservative candidate, while his cousin, William McCombie of
Tillyfour, the black cattle breeder, supported the Liberal contender. At the ensuing election Mr Lesley, the Liberal
prevailed. He was popular in the
countryside, whereas Arthur Gordon’s support came mostly from the towns.
By 1866 the political favours of the two William
McCombies had both switched. There was a
by-election in Aberdeenshire after the resignation of William Leslie, MP. A meeting of the electors in the
Alford district was held in front of the Station Hotel, Alford in May of that
year and Mr Farquharson of Haughton was called to the chair. The two candidates
were Sir James Elphinstone (Conservative) and Mr Dingwall-Fordyce
(Liberal). Mr Anderson, Wellhouse
proposed Dingwall Fordyce as a fit and proper candidate for the county and this
was seconded by William McCombie, Editor of the Free Press. William McCombie of Tillyfour proposed Sir
James Elphinstone, seconded by Mr Grant of Druminor. The meeting, on a show of hands, voted for
Dingwall Fordyce, who was returned at the actual election.
The general election of 1868 was a momentous time for
Aberdeenshire, for two reasons. Firstly,
this was the initial occasion that the county had been divided into two
constituencies, West Aberdeenshire and East Aberdeenshire. Secondly, William McCombie (1805), Aberdeen
Angus breeder from Tillyfour farm, decided to stand for election as MP for West
Aberdeenshire. A full account of his
remarkable campaign is given in William
McCombie (1805 – 1880), “Creator of a peculiarly excellent sort of bullocks”
on this blogsite, but it is important to give a truncated version here to
understand the role of his cousin, William McCombie (1809), by this date of the
farm of Milton of Kemnay.
William McCombie (1805) was a tenant farmer and understood the
problems faced by tenant farmers. Yet
their representatives in Parliament were almost exclusively large
landowners. Legislation introduced into
Parliament in 1866 proposed the creation of a second constituency for
Aberdeenshire. William McCombie (1805),
who was frustrated with the difficulties of reforming the laws which he perceived
as having a negative impact on tenant farmers, saw an opportunity to become an
MP and to exert his influence on vital issues by that route. He conceived an utterly audacious plan. Without seeking the nomination of either
Liberals or the Conservatives and without announcing his candidature (at that
stage no second Aberdeenshire seat existed) he went about lobbying his
potential supporters, the tenant farmers, at cattle markets and other agricultural
events. When he got a positive response,
he entered the name of the respondent in a small brown book, which he carried
for the purpose. He attracted over 1500
supporters in this way. His scheme and
the persistent way in which he implemented it caught the two main political
parties flat-footed and, in the event, he was adopted as MP without a contest
and without ever addressing a public meeting as an announced candidate.
The Aberdeenshire Liberals, realising that they could not field a
candidate against William McCombie (1805) who had any hope of success then
resorted to a crafty strategy of their own.
A previously unheard-of organisation the “Liberal Association of Tenant
Farmers”, led by William McCombie (1809), editor of the Free Press, and James Barclay,
an astute tenant farmer and leading Liberal, then took a leading part in the campaign. This Association claimed that William
McCombie (1805) was an Independent Liberal who held “enlightened views” and
appealed to voters to cast their lot with him.
The Conservative-supporting Aberdeen Journal, under editor William
Forsyth, represented this move by the Liberals as an unprincipled conversion to
Liberalism by William McCombie (1805) to ensure that he got elected. William Forsyth had conducted an unpleasant
campaign against William McCombie (1805)’s candidacy in the pages of his paper
and this denigration of the Laird of Tillyfour subsequently continued for
several years. But the fact remains that
William McCombie (1805) stood as an Independent, though many of his beliefs
were close to those of the Liberal party and he sat with the Liberals in the
Commons and, at a subsequent general election, he was the official Liberal
candidate. William McCombie (1809),
after the return of his cousin as MP for West Aberdeenshire, was able to strike
back at the rival Aberdeen newspaper with the remark in the pages of the Free
Press that the Laird of Tillyfour had been elected “despite the sneers of
witlings (persons who think themselves
witty) and the smiles of the incredulous”.
William McCombie (1809) continued to support his namesake cousin,
during his period in the House of Commons, against the barbs fired from the
offices of the Aberdeen Journal. That
paper accused McCombie, MP of reading his speeches in the House in 1869
(supposedly impermissible). The Free
Press countered with the following comments.
“Mr McCombie (ie of Tillyfour)
is perfectly able to speak for himself and we need only say that we are assured
by eye-witnesses that he never was called to order for reading his speeches,
simply because he never did read a speech and as to handing copies to newspaper
reporters, our contemporary merely shows that he is as far from being en rapport with the usages and
necessities as with the ideas of the time when he makes a novelty and a marvel
of what is done every day. We can
understand this ill-natured spurt of the Journal. Mr McCombie has been gaining a position of
respect and influence for himself in the House of Commons. “Envy will merit as its shade pursue”; and
the Tory organ must move itself accordingly.
Mr McCombie has, almost alone amongst Scottish members exerted any
influence in moulding the Cattle Diseases Bill and for his services in this
matter all important to Aberdeenshire, the landlords’ organ rewards him by this
splenetic ebullition (a sudden outburst
of emotion or violence).” This
phraseology must have sent many readers of the Free Press hunting for their
dictionaries!
The Rinderpest
outbreak 1865 - 1866
In 1865 the Rinderpest (Cattle Plague), a viral disease, was
imported into Britain. The response of
Government was totally inadequate, and the disease quickly spread to most parts
of the British Isles, killing many of the infected animals. It was left largely to local action at a
county level to combat the epidemic.
Aberdeenshire, one of the most important cattle-producing counties in
Britain was particularly effective in first controlling the spread of the disease,
and then eliminating it. This collective
effort was fronted by two men, William McCombie (1805) of Tillyfour, then one
of the most famous cattle breeders in the country and James Barclay of
Auchlossan, another tenant farmer and a leading Liberal. But William McCombie (1809) of the Free Press,
himself a cattle farmer, also played a significant role.
The methods employed to control and eliminate the outbreak were
fundamentally to slaughter infected cattle and to restrict cattle
movements. This thrust of policy was not
easy for farmers or fleshers to accept, as it disrupted their lives and reduced
their assets and incomes. But William
McCombie (1805) and James Barclay were sufficiently authoritative to carry the
day. The success of Aberdeenshire in
controlling the Rinderpest was eventually noticed by Government and its
policies copied in the Cattle Diseases Act of 1866. The effect was immediate
and by late 1866 the outbreak had been eliminated. A full account of the Rinderpest in
Aberdeenshire can be found in William
McCombie (1805 – 1880), “Creator of a peculiarly excellent sort of bullocks”
on this blogsite.
Early in the Rinderpest outbreak, in August 1865, a meeting of
landowners and farmers was held in Alford to agree resolutions to confront the
problem. McCombie of Tillyfour and McCombie
of Cairnballoch were both present and played prominent parts in the
proceedings, with McCombie of Cairnballoch seconding the main motion. “That the landowners, farmers and others
present, looking with alarm at the spread of the cattle plague in Aberdeenshire,
resolved to adopt and urged others to adopt every means in their power to
prevent the introduction of this contagious malady into the Vale of Alford and
in order the more effectually to do so they agreed not to purchase or bring
into the Vale cattle from any other district so long as the cattle plague
continues to spread in the county, to use every legitimate means in their power
to prevent cattle being brought from a distance and exposed for sale in the
Alford or other markets in the Vale and in the meantime to recommend to farmers, cattle dealers and others as much as possible to restrict their
purchases of stock and not to expose cattle for sale in the Alford or other
markets in the district.” This
supporting role played by William McCombie (1809) continued throughout the
crisis period in 1865 – 1866. His
facility with the English language was put to particular use in drafting
documents and resolutions. For example,
at a public meeting in Aberdeen in December 1865 he drafted all six resolutions
that were debated and approved. But it
was not just as a drafter that he contributed to the collective effort. He also made an input of ideas to the ongoing
debate, no doubt informed by his own long-standing career in agriculture.
The Game
Laws
Legislation concerning the killing of game, which was favourable
to the interests of the big landowners, accumulated over many years. This was not surprising since most rural MPs
were drawn from this social group. The
impact of these laws often generated a poisonous intrusion on the relationship between
tenant farmers and their landlords. In
Aberdeenshire, this was frequently related to the predation of the turnip crop
which, from the 1830s, became crucially important in the overwinter feeding of
beef cattle. The source of the conflict
usually arose when the landowner let the land for growing crops separately from
the let of shooting rights over the same land.
It was then in the landlord’s interests to encourage game preservation,
even though this was detrimental to the tenant farmers’ interests.
From about 1865 there was considerable agitation by the farmers
for reform of the Game Laws. William
McCombie (1809), himself a farmer, sympathised with his brother
agriculturalists and played an active part in the movement seeking Game Law
reform. In May 1865 a discussion on the
Game Laws took place at the Chamber of Agriculture and Scottish Farmers’ Club
in Edinburgh. William McCombie (1805) of
Tillyfour, whose views coincided with his cousin, the editor of the Free Press,
played a prominent part in the meeting.
William McCombie (1809) was also present at the meeting. He was much pleased with the tone of the
discussion and said that he entirely disapproved of the Game Laws and sincerely
wished to see them abolished. He felt it
was time for the farmers to take action but, in pressing for reform, he
cautioned them against taking “too advanced a position” initially. He felt this would be counter-productive and
that they should seek only that which was practically achievable. At a public meeting in Aberdeen Corn Exchange
in June 1865, William McCombie of Cairnballoch denounced game preserving as, “not
only contrary to good farming but contrary to the public good”. Sadly, he did not live to see the Game Laws
reformed. The power of the landowners in
Parliament was still strong and their views sufficiently entrenched to ward off
several attempts at reform.
Social
reform in the countryside
Social reform, especially concerning the conditions of life for
farm labourers and small tenant farmers, was another topic close to the heart
of William McCombie (1809). A public
meeting was held at Kinmuick, Keith Hall in October 1859, attended by farmers (including
William McCombie (1809)) and farm labourers, for the purpose of forming an
Association for Social Reform. According
to the Aberdeen Herald, “The speakers dwelt on the restless habits induced by
feeing markets, the want of cottage accommodation, the necessity of individual
improvement, the extension of moderate-sized farms and small-holdings on a
secure tenure, the evil results of bothies, the necessity of promoting
aspiration and industrial habits among farm-labourers and the necessity of
social intercourse being guided, not by customs founded on selfishness, but on
a hearty recognition of the good old rule of doing as we would be done by.” The Association was governed by a committee
consisting of 12 farmers and 12 farm servants.
In 1860 William McCombie (1809) addressed the Skene Social Reform
Association annual soiree in the Free Church school. A ploughing match was due to be held on the
same day, but it had to be called off.
William McCombie’s address was on, “The analogy between good ploughing
and culture of the mind.”
James Macdonell, who had been a part-time contributor to the
Aberdeen Free Press until 1862 but then became a full-time journalist with the
Edinburgh Daily Review, maintained contact with William McCombie (1809) and his
family. In Edinburgh he made the
acquaintance of Dr Begg, another social reformer. James reported his conversation with Begg in
a letter to William McCombie in August 1862.
“Tell Mrs McCombie (ie William’s
wife, Ann Robertson) that I made known to the doctor her wish that he would
come to Alford and stay long enough to see the working of the farm-kitchen system
(on some farms, the farm servants ate
with the farmer and his family, rather than being accommodated in bothies)
in that quarter. I likewise told him
what stores of information on that subject Mrs McCombie had ready to pour into
“his lap” … . I was unable to give him
an account of the schemes for the improvement of the agricultural classes which
Mrs McCombie has so often dinned into my ears.”
It is interesting that Mrs McCombie was not just a farmer’s wife holding
the fort at Cairnballoch while her husband was away, but an active social
reformer in her own right.
The death
of William McCombie (1809)
William McCombie (1809) did not enjoy good health. As early as 1856 it was reported that he had a
“delicate state of health”. In 1861 James Macdonell wrote, “Mr McCombie’s
health which for years has been delicate has at last fairly given way”. In early 1870 it was reported that “he was
laid low with a severe attack of bronchitis and chronic dyspepsia, ailments
from which he had suffered for most of his life”. William died following an attack of
bronchitis on 6th May 1870.
He was buried in the churchyard at Tough near Alford, close to many of
his illustrious relations, including Rev Dr Charles McCombie, Minister of
Lumphanan for many years, William McCombie (1805) of Tillyfour, the famous
Aberdeen Angus cattle breeder and Thomas McCombie, who spent much of his life
in the Legislature of Melbourne, Australia.
It is a moving experience to stand among the memorials to the McCombies
in Tough kirkyard and reflect upon their achievements of 150 years ago.
William
Alexander becomes editor of the Free Press
On the death of William McCombie (1809) in 1870, William Alexander
of “Johnny Gibb” fame inevitably graduated to the editorial seat at the
Aberdeen Free Press, but its editorial direction did not waver from the political
and social stance established by William McCombie. Also, like his predecessor, William Alexander
continued to write and publish and to address meetings held in
Aberdeenshire. In 1871 he contributed a
lecture on, “Illustrations of home
life in the olden time. Habits and
customs of the counties north of the Dee from 1690 to 1820”, to a series
mounted in the Parish of Woodside. In the same year he also addressed Oldmeldrum
Mechanics’ Institute with a lecture entitled “Illustrations of Social Life in
the last century”. The following year,
1872, William Alexander received a complimentary letter from William Ewart
Gladstone, then serving his first period as Prime Minister, who had read and
enjoyed “Johnny Gibb of Gushetneuk”, which was published in book form in 1871. Gladstone was of Scottish ancestry and he
often stayed at Fasque House in Kincardineshire. His liberal politics encompassed equal
opportunity and free trade and he was very popular with the working
classes. It is perhaps not surprising
that Gladstone should have been attracted to the character of Johnny Gibb and
the Doric dialect in which Johnny frequently communicated. Politically, William Alexander was a strong
supporter of William Gladstone and hostile to Benjamin Disraeli. William Alexander stepped down as editor of
the Free Press about 1876. He received
the honorary degree of LL D from the University of Aberdeen and was appointed a
JP in his retirement. He died in 1894.
Henry
Alexander (1841 – 1914)
The following editor of the Aberdeen Free Press was Henry
Alexander, the brother of William Alexander.
Henry, who acceded to the editorship at the age of 34, had married Annie
McCombie, William McCombie (1809)’s second daughter, in 1874. Henry started to contribute articles to the
Free Press in the late 1860s and joined the paper on a full-time basis in 1872,
rising to the post of editor in 1876 on the retirement of his brother. Henry’s life was totally focussed on the Free
Press and he took no part in public life.
Like the two previous editors of the newspaper he had a deep interest in
rural matters. Henry Alexander had a
penetrating and independent mind and did not adhere to a purely party
standpoint. On his death in 1915 he left
a personal estate of £26,817 (equivalent to about £2,950,000 in 2018 money).
Henry Alexander and his wife Annie had a family of four children,
two boys and two girls. Henry junior was
born in 1875 and William McCombie followed in 1880. Henry junior was educated at Aberdeen Grammar
School and Aberdeen University. At the
1901 Census of Scotland, Henry junior was described as a journalist and William
was a law student. By 1911 Census, both
were employed by the Free Press. Indeed,
by this date, Henry junior must have become a part-owner of the newspaper,
since he was described as “journalist and employer” while his brother William
was a “journalist (worker)”. He became
the editor of the Weekly Free Press.
William McCombie Alexander continued to work for the Free Press until
1922, when it merged with the Aberdeen Journal.
After this date William McCombie (1880) spent his time in scholastic
pursuits, having interests in a wide variety of topics. He travelled extensively in Soviet Russia and
also published “Place-names of Aberdeenshire”.
He was awarded an honorary Doctorate in 1952 and died in 1959. Henry Alexander junior became the fourth
editor of the Aberdeen Free Press in 1915 on the death of his father. He lived at the prestigious address of 1
Queens Road, Aberdeen and in 1919 at the age of 44 he was appointed a JP for
the City and County of Aberdeen.
Sir Henry Alexander (1875 - 1940)
The merger
of the Aberdeen Free Press and the Aberdeen Journal
In July 1919 the Free Press premises at 30 Union Street were badly
damaged by fire and 14 linotype machines were destroyed. However, the stereotyping department on the
upper floor was saved. Interestingly,
the Free Press’ rival, the Aberdeen Journal stepped in to help print the Free
Press and the Evening Gazette. Perhaps
this act of generosity presaged further cooperation? However, another factor was the beginning of
the decline of Liberal Party and support for Liberal views in the aftermath of
WW1. By the early 1920s, Aberdeen, in
spite of its relatively small population, still supported two daily
newspapers. Economic reality dictated
that the city and its environs would only be able to support one daily paper in
the future and the Free Press approached the Journal to suggest a merger. In 1922, the Aberdeen Journal reported the
inevitable change as follows. “Negotiations
have been completed for the amalgamation of the “Aberdeen Daily Journal” and
the “Aberdeen Free Press” and the “Evening Express” and the “Evening Gazette”
and the weekly issues of the “Journal” and the “Free Press”, subject to the
approval of the shareholders of the Aberdeen and North of Scotland Newspaper
and Printing Co, Limited. The
amalgamated papers will be formed into a company to be styled “Aberdeen
Newspapers Ltd” and the accounts will be merged from 1st November
next, the fusion of the newspapers taking place at an early date.” Both Henry Alexander junior and William
Alexander were shareholders in the corporate owner of the merged
newspaper. The amalgamated daily
newspaper took the name “Aberdeen Press and Journal”, which it maintains to
this day, the new title clearly indicating its origins in the Aberdeen Journal
and the Aberdeen Free Press.
At the merger, William Maxwell, editor of the Journal was
retained, putting Henry Alexander junior, erstwhile editor of the Free Press,
out of a job. Now wealthy, he turned his
attention to public life and entered the city council in 1925. He rose rapidly to prominence and was Lord
Provost between 1932 and 1935. His most
important contribution to the life of the city was his leading role in the
preparation of a district planning scheme for Aberdeen and its environs, which
was then the largest such plan of its kind in the country. He was keen on outdoor pursuits, the author
of the Scottish Mountaineering Club guide to the Cairngorms and a prominent
early skier in Scotland. Henry Alexander
junior also donated the maze at Hazelhead Park, much beloved of generations of
Aberdeen children, to the city. He
received an honorary LLD from his alma
mater and was knighted for civic services in 1938. Henry Alexander junior died of a heart attack
in 1940, leaving a personal estate of £69,521 (about £M 4.3 in 2018 money). His funeral at St Nicholas West Parish church
was “largely attended”.
Thus, the Aberdeen Free Press, mainly the creation of William
McCombie (1809) of Cairnballoch, a farmer’s son from rural Aberdeenshire who
was essentially self-educated, ceased to exist as an independent title. The new Aberdeen newspaper, the Aberdeen Press
and Journal is usually portrayed as having had its origins in the Aberdeen
Journal first published in 1748. But it
should not be forgotten that it disappeared in the merger of 1922 between the
Journal and the Free Press, both titles being essential historical components
of the successor.
The context
of William McCombie (1809)’s life
There was nothing in the family circumstances of William McCombie
which led to any other expectation than that he would follow in his father’s
footsteps as a mixed farmer with a herd of black cattle, hefted to rural
Aberdeenshire. He had no particular
stimulus at home, nor at his village school, nor in the social contacts of his
parents, which might have predisposed him to follow a life replete with
intellectual challenge in the city of Aberdeen.
That he did so as well as fulfilling his destiny as an Aberdeenshire
farmer is doubly remarkable. It is an
inevitable conclusion that there was something unusual about the genetic
inheritance of this son of the soil, some recombination of the hereditary
material of his parents which equipped him to tackle profound issues of
religion, philosophy and metaphysics, without an advanced education by teachers
immersed for years in such abstruse matters, his only access to intellectual
debate being the writings of the leading practitioners and the time to digest
such material in the half-light of the farm kitchen during the darkness of the
Aberdeenshire winter.
But perhaps the dual life of farmer and intellectual did impose a
restriction upon William McCombie of Cairnballoch, by shackling him with a
degree of parochialism. The need to be
present on the farm on a regular basis and especially at the busy times in the
farming calendar must have restricted his ability to travel, to study and to
engage in discourse with leading thinkers distant from his rural home. Some of the topics that he evaluated had a
national relevance, yet he never made a great impact upon the intellectual life
of the nation. Would his reputation as a
thinker have been advanced by a higher education and by personal contact with
the leading thinkers of the day? Who can
say, but his impact would hardly have been diminished by such social
intercourse.
It has been suggested by others that William McCombie (1809)
stands second only to the geologist Hugh Miller in the annals of self-educated
Scotsmen who have made great contributions to scholastic life over the last two
hundred years. There were similarities
between the two in their family circumstances.
Both were sons of the northern half of Scotland, both were born into
modest homes, both showed an early aptitude for reading, both were essentially
self-educated, both became writers, both were involved with the evangelical
churches. Hugh Miller graduated to
geology through his apprenticeship to a stonemason and his observation of
fossils in the quarries where he worked. In a similar way, William McCombie was
directly influenced by his workplace, the agricultural industry of rural
Aberdeenshire with its landowners, tenant farmers and peasantry and the
asymmetrical distribution of wealth between social classes. The two men were also constrained by their
adherence to Biblical truths. Miller
realised that the earth was of great age, but he believed that the fossils of
extinct animals that he observed were evidence of Divine intervention and new
species arose by fresh acts of creation over geological time, the similarities
between older and newer species arising, not from descent but from the
preferences in the mind of God. Although
not a scientist, McCombie believed that there was a life force in living things
brought about by the Almighty, which distinguished the living from the
non-living. But an essential difference
between the two men was that Miller was an observer of nature, while McCombie
was a theoriser. Miller also broke out
of the parochial circumstances of his birth on the Black Isle and travelled to
Edinburgh, becoming editor of a church newspaper, the Witness. But Edinburgh, the home of the Enlightenment,
allowed him to promote his geological ideas in much more influential circles
than those operating in Aberdeen, which was the essential limit of William
McCombie’s intellectual travels. Also,
the obscurity and impenetrable nature of many of McCombie’s works limited their
audience and thus also their impact.
A constant theme of William McCombie (1809)’s life was his
attraction to others who, like himself, had risen above modest circumstances
and made a real contribution to the society in which they lived. Alexander Bethune, the Fife agricultural
labourer, George Murray, the Peterhead cobbler, William Alexander, the farmer’s
son from the Garioch, James Macdonell, the Excise man’s son from Dyce, William
Watt, the weaver from Alford, Andrew Halliday (Duff) the minister’s son from
Marnoch and William Carnie, the engraver from Alford, all hailed from the north
east of Scotland and all, except Bethune, were recruited as contributors to the
Aberdeen Free Press by its first editor.
Indeed, the quality of the staff stimulated the ultimate success to that
hopeful new entrant to the newspaper market of Aberdeen, back in the 1850s. The Free Press eventually swallowed its most
direct competitor, the Aberdeen Herald and then merged with its main rival, the
Aberdeen Journal.
The staff of the Free Press in its early years shared with William
McCombie similarities in their approaches to religion and to the organisation
of society. As a generalisation they
were liberals, with both a lower-case and an upper-case “L”, they were members
of non-conformist churches, such as the Free Church, the Congregationalists,
the Baptists and the United Presbyterians.
Politically, they wanted to change society and give it a fairer, more just
structure. They were for the working
man, without excusing him from his responsibilities to be prudent with his
limited resources and to take responsibility for his own educational and
economic improvement. And they despised
the lavish and wasteful lifestyles of some big landowners. These characteristics were also shared by two
of the other founding owners of the Free Press, David Macallan, George
King. These men were essentially
practical businessmen with literary leanings and a compulsion to do good works
in their home city, rather than intellectuals, but their role in risking their
money and managing the newspaper business were important, nonetheless.
The intermarriage of the McCombie and Alexander families was
brought about by the creation of the Free Press and, in turn, the newspaper
prospered under the editorial guidance of family members throughout its 69-year
history as an independent title. William
McCombie (1809) was the founding editor of the Aberdeen Free Press and he was
succeeded by William Alexander, creator of “Johnny Gibb”. His brother, Henry Alexander, both married
William McCombie’s daughter, Annie, and became the third editor, and their son,
Henry junior, became the fourth and last editor. Although the Aberdeen Free Press disappeared
as an independent title in 1922, it formed an essential part of the historical fabric
of its successor, the still extant Aberdeen Press and Journal.
William McCombie (1809) deserves a place in the pantheon of
self-made Scots. Perhaps his failure to
spread his wings much beyond the boundaries of his native county made his
impact at home the greater?
Don Fox
20190212
donaldpfox@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment